Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "cifs_prime_dcach".
Did you mean:
cifs_prime_dcache
2019 Feb 14
3
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
Saurabh Nanda <saurabhnanda at gmail.com> writes:
> I found something interesting in /proc/fs/cifs/Stats. Notice the
> "QueryDirectories > Failed" number. This keeps increasing as along as `ls
> -lR` is running.
That's interesting indeed. The verbose logs and network trace would tell
us more.
--
Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97
2019 Feb 15
0
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
...d-backoffice kernel: [57211.598147]
/build/linux-Y38gIP/linux-4.15.0/fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 16294
offset 72
Feb 15 05:43:23 prod-backoffice kernel: [57211.601375]
/build/linux-Y38gIP/linux-4.15.0/fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 16370
Feb 15 05:43:23 prod-backoffice kernel: [57211.635502] cifs_prime_dcache:
202 callbacks suppressed
Feb 15 05:43:23 prod-backoffice kernel: [57211.635505]
/build/linux-Y38gIP/linux-4.15.0/fs/cifs/readdir.c: cifs_prime_dcache: for
18
Feb 15 05:43:23 prod-backoffice kernel: [57211.644419]
/build/linux-Y38gIP/linux-4.15.0/fs/cifs/inode.c: cifs_revalidate_cache:
revalidatin...