search for: cidrs

...support the use of IPv4 CIDR notation (e.g. A.B.C.D/maskbits) ? The specific documentation page I was looking at, i.e.: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch06.html was rather entirely ambiguous on this one small point. When describing the interfaces clause, it says explicitly that CIDRs are allowed. But when it comes to hosts allow and hosts deny, the same page is silent about CIDR notation. So, you know, I have to ask.

...>> >> The specific documentation page I was looking at, i.e.: >> >> https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch06.html >> >> was rather entirely ambiguous on this one small point. When describing >> the interfaces clause, it says explicitly that CIDRs are allowed. But >> when it comes to hosts allow and hosts deny, the same page is silent >> about CIDR notation. >> >> So, you know, I have to ask > >yes they do and you could have easily tried it out Well, actually, I *did* try it out. And it did *seem* to work,...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Bug ID: 3544 Summary: Support CIDR notation for host pattern matching Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

> > > Morning Louis, Unless I totally misread this, the OP only > wants the DC > to query itself, no clients. > > I could understand it if they only wanted domain members to > query the DC. > > Stop and think about this, a client wants to know where > another domain > member is, or worse still, where the DC is, who does it ask ? It asks > its

I have a few settings that change based on the network that a system is in, and I have a heterogeneous collection of networks (a few /24s, some /25s, a /29 and a couple /27s, and hey look a /16 in rfc1918 space and...). So I can''t do simple regex matches on dotted-quad IP notation and expect to get a complete story. What I''d like is something like, I dunno... $nameserver =

Dear openssh-unix-dev list, in OpenSSH 5.1 you introduced CIDR address/masklen matching for "Match address" blocks in sshd_config as well as supporting CIDR matching in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys from="..." restrictions in sshd. I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would be quite

...lizing the most significant 32 bits of the "v6_mask", but leaving the other 96 bits at zero (zero-filling malloc assumed). IPv4 Mask: FFFF FFFF (OK) IPv6 Mask: FFFF FFFF 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 (PROBLEM) This is the state of the mask BEFORE calling prefix_to_netmask(), which for CIDRs greater than 32 will be shifting zero bits with zero bit fill - or in other words, DOING NOTHING. Since these bits are already zero, we cannot match them. We should initialize the mask with this instead (as a "diff"): - info->v4_mask = 0xFFFFFFFFUL; + info->v6_mask[...

First off, I apologize for reporting a problem with a "historical" version of Samba, but this is what we use in our production environment due to some integration issues with the 3.0 series. I've been experiencing a problem with Samba 2.2.x when trying to use a CIDR notation for hosts allow/deny when that CIDR prefix is not one of ( /8, /16, /24, or /32). When I included a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5851 Summary: Name lookup failures and CIDR regression Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 Bug ID: 2645 Summary: allow cidr matching of host in ssh_config Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Damien Miller wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Peter Stuge wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22:34AM +0200, Bert Courtin wrote: > > > I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented > > > for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would > > > be quite beneficially (at least for me, maybe

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=994 Bug ID: 994 Summary: Named sets with type "ipv4_addr" do not allow adding CIDR elements Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=840 Summary: Specifying CIDR when adding to a hash:ip entry is silently ignored Product: ipset Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: default AssignedTo:

I found a command-line program that did this once before, used it for a while and then forgot about it until right now and I'll be damned if I can find it again. A command line IP calculator that takes an address range and give it back in cidr format. I found an online one that does this here: http://www.ipaddresslocation.org/subnet-mask-calculator.php But I would prefer to have the

Helo hostname MUST have resolvable hostname. Crazy or not, but i use this. The _access-allow parts for server you really trust. smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination, check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/check_client_access-allow.cidr, reject_unknown_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_hostname, reject_invalid_hostname,

Just updated to 3.0.4 under cygwin and I'm now getting lookup failures in the log. 2008/10/24 00:13:23 [1984] name lookup failed for X.X.X.X: Unknown server error Looking at the code it seems the call will never succeed? /* reverse lookup */ name_err = getnameinfo((struct sockaddr *) ss, ss_len, name_buf, name_buf_size, port_buf, port_buf_size,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=854 Summary: xtables_ipmask_to_cidr error code leaks into output of iptables --list Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: iptables

hello list hello dovecot network hello all the reader here is a sieve script this ######################################## require ["fileinto","regex","comparator-i;ascii-numeric","reject","relational"]; # rule:[spammanage] if header :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" ["X-Spam-score"] ["500"] {

Running CentOS 4.2 with all updates. I've been using sendmail for my MTA since forever. I've grown used to it and I can make it do what I want it to. However (there's always a catch, isn't there)... Lately it seems that some mail is being lost. I've noticed some instances when a message was sent to myself and others which I will only see if someone replies back to

In bind: Allow-CIDR { ... Range/XX } Deny-CIDR { ... Range/XX } That stops use of DNS And/or firewalling it, Deny CIDR first for full server. Allow CIDR for full server. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 23 augustus 2019 10:40 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >