search for: cidrings

Just a trivial question... Do the hosts allow and hosts deny clauses (i.e. within smb.conf) support the use of IPv4 CIDR notation (e.g. A.B.C.D/maskbits) ? The specific documentation page I was looking at, i.e.: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch06.html was rather entirely ambiguous on this one small point. When describing the interfaces clause, it says explicitly that CIDRs

In message <ca330312-5343-b7e5-328a-d2b554330081 at thelounge.net>, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >Am 17.10.2017 um 04:24 schrieb Ronald F. Guilmette via samba: >> Just a trivial question... >> >> Do the hosts allow and hosts deny clauses (i.e. within smb.conf) support >> the use of IPv4 CIDR notation (e.g. A.B.C.D/maskbits) ? >>

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Bug ID: 3544 Summary: Support CIDR notation for host pattern matching Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

> > > Morning Louis, Unless I totally misread this, the OP only > wants the DC > to query itself, no clients. > > I could understand it if they only wanted domain members to > query the DC. > > Stop and think about this, a client wants to know where > another domain > member is, or worse still, where the DC is, who does it ask ? It asks > its

I have a few settings that change based on the network that a system is in, and I have a heterogeneous collection of networks (a few /24s, some /25s, a /29 and a couple /27s, and hey look a /16 in rfc1918 space and...). So I can''t do simple regex matches on dotted-quad IP notation and expect to get a complete story. What I''d like is something like, I dunno... $nameserver =

Dear openssh-unix-dev list, in OpenSSH 5.1 you introduced CIDR address/masklen matching for "Match address" blocks in sshd_config as well as supporting CIDR matching in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys from="..." restrictions in sshd. I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would be quite

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597 Summary: ip6tables connlimit - cannot set CIDR greater than 32 (includes fix) Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: ip6tables AssignedTo: laforge

First off, I apologize for reporting a problem with a "historical" version of Samba, but this is what we use in our production environment due to some integration issues with the 3.0 series. I've been experiencing a problem with Samba 2.2.x when trying to use a CIDR notation for hosts allow/deny when that CIDR prefix is not one of ( /8, /16, /24, or /32). When I included a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5851 Summary: Name lookup failures and CIDR regression Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 Bug ID: 2645 Summary: allow cidr matching of host in ssh_config Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Damien Miller wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Peter Stuge wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22:34AM +0200, Bert Courtin wrote: > > > I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented > > > for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would > > > be quite beneficially (at least for me, maybe

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=994 Bug ID: 994 Summary: Named sets with type "ipv4_addr" do not allow adding CIDR elements Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=840 Summary: Specifying CIDR when adding to a hash:ip entry is silently ignored Product: ipset Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: default AssignedTo:

I found a command-line program that did this once before, used it for a while and then forgot about it until right now and I'll be damned if I can find it again. A command line IP calculator that takes an address range and give it back in cidr format. I found an online one that does this here: http://www.ipaddresslocation.org/subnet-mask-calculator.php But I would prefer to have the

Helo hostname MUST have resolvable hostname. Crazy or not, but i use this. The _access-allow parts for server you really trust. smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination, check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/check_client_access-allow.cidr, reject_unknown_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_hostname, reject_invalid_hostname,

Just updated to 3.0.4 under cygwin and I'm now getting lookup failures in the log. 2008/10/24 00:13:23 [1984] name lookup failed for X.X.X.X: Unknown server error Looking at the code it seems the call will never succeed? /* reverse lookup */ name_err = getnameinfo((struct sockaddr *) ss, ss_len, name_buf, name_buf_size, port_buf, port_buf_size,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=854 Summary: xtables_ipmask_to_cidr error code leaks into output of iptables --list Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: iptables

hello list hello dovecot network hello all the reader here is a sieve script this ######################################## require ["fileinto","regex","comparator-i;ascii-numeric","reject","relational"]; # rule:[spammanage] if header :value "ge" :comparator "i;ascii-numeric" ["X-Spam-score"] ["500"] {

Running CentOS 4.2 with all updates. I've been using sendmail for my MTA since forever. I've grown used to it and I can make it do what I want it to. However (there's always a catch, isn't there)... Lately it seems that some mail is being lost. I've noticed some instances when a message was sent to myself and others which I will only see if someone replies back to

In bind: Allow-CIDR { ... Range/XX } Deny-CIDR { ... Range/XX } That stops use of DNS And/or firewalling it, Deny CIDR first for full server. Allow CIDR for full server. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 23 augustus 2019 10:40 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >