search for: ci2

...in can I put them on the same plot? x<-seq(1,10,1) y<-seq(1,10,1) ci<-y*.10 ciupper<-y+ci cilower<-y-ci xYplot(Cbind(y,cilower,ciupper)~x, method="filled bands", col.fill="light grey", type=c("b")) x2<-seq(1,5,.5) y2<-seq(1,5,.5) ci2<-y2*.10 ciupper2<-y2+ci2 cilower2<-y2-ci2 xYplot(Cbind(y2,cilower2,ciupper2)~x2, method="filled bands",col.fill="light grey", type=c("b")) ------------------------------------------- Joe King, M.A. Ph.D. Student University of Washington - Seattle...

...ion(M, Intrinsic::returnaddress), &Args1[0], array_endof(Args1), "Call Return Address", InsPt); CallInst will get the return address and it works. While, in the epilogue of the function, due to the canary has been inserted. I write the similar code: ConstantInt* ci2 = llvm::ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(RI->getContext()), 1); Value* Args3[] = {ci2}; CallInst* callInst1 = CallInst::Create(Intrinsic::getDeclaration(M, Intrinsic::returnaddress), &Args3[0], array_endof(Args3), "Caaall Return Address", BB); But...

...the variance of the difference of two independent random variables is the sum of their variances, plus the observation that the width of the confidence interval is 2*z*SE, where z is the normal quantile corresponding to the confidence level (e.g., 1.96 for a 95% CI). ciDiff <- function(ci1, ci2, level=0.95){ p1 <- mean(ci1) p2 <- mean(ci2) z <- qnorm((1 - level)/2, lower.tail=FALSE) se1 <- (ci1[2] - ci1[1])/(2*z) se2 <- (ci2[2] - ci2[1])/(2*z) seDiff <- sqrt(se1^2 + se2^2) (p1 - p2) + c(-z, z)*seDiff } > > Example: Prevalence of Diabetes: &g...

Hi, anybody have any ideas on this ? I have two sequences of proportions. Due to conventions in my field, I need to produce a linear correlation between the two. Each sequence of proportions are based upon differing numbers of observations (although within a sequence the number of observations may not fluctuate too much) so it may be necessary/advisable to variance stabilize. Is their a best

...rently active >> function. >> >>> >>> CallInst will get the return address and it works. >>> >>> While, in the epilogue of the function, due to the canary has been >>> inserted. I write the similar code: >>> >>> ConstantInt* ci2 = >>> llvm::ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(RI->getContext()), 1); >>> Value* Args3[] = {ci2}; >>> CallInst* callInst1 = >>> CallInst::Create(Intrinsic::getDeclaration(M, >>> Intrinsic::returnaddress), >>> &Args3[0], array_end...

...cx cmp edx, 1 jl SHORT $LN3 at TESTE add ecx, 1 imul ecx, edx add eax, ecx $LN3 at TESTE: ; 20 : { ; 21 : varx = varx + parami + 1 ; ; 22 : vary = varx + nI; ; 23 : } ; 24 : ; 25 : return varx ; ; 26 : } ret 0 _TESTE ENDP _TEXT ENDS PUBLIC ??_C at _0CG@LBAPCNHJ@?6?$CI2?$CJleu?5?$CFld?5threadid?5?$DN?5?5?$CFld?5seqt@ ; `string' PUBLIC __real at 3ff0000000000000 PUBLIC _thread_call EXTRN _printf:PROC EXTRN __imp__GetCurrentThreadId at 0:PROC EXTRN __fltused:DWORD ; COMDAT ??_C at _0CG@LBAPCNHJ@?6?$CI2?$CJleu?5?$CFld?5threadid?5?$DN?5?5?$CFld?5seqt@ CONST SEGMEN...

...LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-hard-float.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-varargs.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/cconv/return-hard-fp128.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/cconv/return-hard-struct-f128.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/ci2.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/countleading.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/divrem.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/dynamic-stack-realignment.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/inlineasm-operand-code.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/Mips/mips64muldiv.ll > LLVM :: CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64-crsave.mir > LLVM...

...::Base belongs_to :content, :polymorphic => true end The table, cis ,contains the following records ============================================= id | ci_number | content_id | content_type ----+----------+-----------+------------+-------------- 1 | CI1 | 1 | SoftwareCi 2 | CI2 | 2 | SoftwareCi 3 | CI3 | 1 | HardwareCi 4 | CI4 | 2 | HardwareCi The table, software_cis ,contains the following records ===================================================== id | asset_tag | status | version ----+-------------------+--...

I'd like to (re)start a discussion on a few gotchas in FileCheck that I've noticed working on various tests in llvm's suites. This begain in a review [1], but I'll try to summarize here so it gets the right audience before decisions are made on it (so to speak). 1: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77227 The main sticking point is the abundance of checks in FileCheck tests that appear to

I''m in the process of locking down as much of my systems here as possible as to available ports. I am down to only a handful but am not sure how much of a security risk they pose and was wondering if anyone here might be able to comment, or suggest secure versions to run: 21/FTP (WU-ftpd v2.4.2 BETA 14) 22/SSH (1.22) 23/TELNET (Netkit 0.09) 25/SMTP (Sendmail

...Z_ z9|z|Y{SCx7>Td$C)ZYT0k9y$8>2D)GLw^T&gZ?h?Lj679Ir{s^ovF8kWNuS7>uDcQ z;U<5GtOxavWTPJ=zD55;3glCXKLcf({yFe{`WL_t>t6zI*S`XONdKBjkNO)bu5`bp z(s}p}Ia~GbX=kIi@~E!<faK%)2iWu<)7!T;`YOA1U2J%J^dIFi_(@cO2^07{75n&J zxD5T2eR}#YD7s(20DMqy&_!>=7XPF^O2;u#A1x_kbTNjppgg6Ila%p at Kci2O@rj5Z z(kB5Q&?oEWiB at Jz1?jLpO(#Zw<vE>B2XTh3#OuRMUFgFs08v1$za7FVRgUV~Y?L^z z&jCK6&jmiF&l7ofkoo#4y~P4uRZi;*bWJ&<Po{;+2fC2D5a}XaTKB~uoYf~F>wR5J zJ5gTMmr90Zh`+5b2Yypu0enth3H*gV6}<21LXF_d>8pW1)7R*Q%14N;1$?frL+Vpq z7{@~8Lxk(4EH)tamc9}A9eoq<8~VM#FY23t-_^IE%*TjLLY...