search for: chumby

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19213 Summary: it can't support chumby widgets function Product: swfdec Version: unspecified Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org...

My first ARM testing results or lack of them indicate that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of contention and relegated to target testing. Based on my observations minimum memory required to build LLVM-3.0 seems to be 768MB to 1GB of RAM plus a 1.2+ GB of free disk space for one kind of...

...ng results or lack of them indicate > that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. > It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. > My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started > eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. > > So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix > and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of contention > and relegated to target testing. > > Based on my observations minimum memory required to build LLVM-3.0 > seems to be 768MB to 1GB of RAM plus a 1.2+ GB of free dis...

Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? Thanks! Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies,...

...: Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer > > Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. > > However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) > > Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? > > Thanks! > > Joe Abbey >...

...uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? Thanks! Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Tech...

...s.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? Thanks! Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies,...

...: Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer > > Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. > > However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) > > Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? > > Thanks! > > Joe Abbey >...

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com> wrote: > However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM > on a host of target boards.  We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, > iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc.  And most of those are already > booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on > llvm-test-suite) > Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? The ARM-based Raspberry Pi is very clo...

...ng results or lack of them indicate > that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. > It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. > My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started > eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. > > So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix > and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of contention > and relegated to target testing. > > Based on my observations minimum memory required to build LLVM-3.0 > seems to be 768MB to 1GB of RAM plus a 1.2+ GB of free dis...

On 11 October 2011 18:22, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > 1. We should define which ARM-related features (in general, e.g. > platforms, cores, modes, etc.) we consider "release important" > 2. We should define the conditions how the features in 1. should be tested > 3. Someone should perform such testing for each release, provide help > with

Hi James, > It goes without saying that I +1 this. Well, the answer should be pretty easy, I think: 1. We should define which ARM-related features (in general, e.g. platforms, cores, modes, etc.) we consider "release important" 2. We should define the conditions how the features in 1. should be tested 3. Someone should perform such testing for each release, provide help with

...; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; James Molloy Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com> wrote: > However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM > on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, > iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already > booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on > llvm-test-suite) > Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? The ARM-based Raspberry Pi is very clo...

...; James Molloy Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com<mailto:jabbey at arxan.com>> wrote: However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which are based on llvm-test-suite) Could ARM enable us with testing hardware/resources? The ARM-based Raspberry Pi is very close to shipping. The...