search for: chscs

...> wrote: > > Apologies if that already has been answered (and I missed it in my mail > > pile...), but two things had come to my mind previously: > > > > - CHSC... does anything need to be done there? Last time I asked: > > "Anyway, css_bus_init() uses some chscs > > early (before cio_dma_pool_init), so we could not use the pools > > there, even if we wanted to. Do chsc commands either work, or else > > fail benignly on a protected virt guest?" > > Protected virt won't support all CHSC. The supported ones won'...

...1 + > 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Apologies if that already has been answered (and I missed it in my mail pile...), but two things had come to my mind previously: - CHSC... does anything need to be done there? Last time I asked: "Anyway, css_bus_init() uses some chscs early (before cio_dma_pool_init), so we could not use the pools there, even if we wanted to. Do chsc commands either work, or else fail benignly on a protected virt guest?" - PCI indicators... does this interact with any dma configuration on the pci device? (I know pci is not suppor...

...1 + > 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Apologies if that already has been answered (and I missed it in my mail pile...), but two things had come to my mind previously: - CHSC... does anything need to be done there? Last time I asked: "Anyway, css_bus_init() uses some chscs early (before cio_dma_pool_init), so we could not use the pools there, even if we wanted to. Do chsc commands either work, or else fail benignly on a protected virt guest?" - PCI indicators... does this interact with any dma configuration on the pci device? (I know pci is not suppor...

...insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > Apologies if that already has been answered (and I missed it in my mail > pile...), but two things had come to my mind previously: > > - CHSC... does anything need to be done there? Last time I asked: > "Anyway, css_bus_init() uses some chscs > early (before cio_dma_pool_init), so we could not use the pools > there, even if we wanted to. Do chsc commands either work, or else > fail benignly on a protected virt guest?" Protected virt won't support all CHSC. The supported ones won't requre use of shared mem...

...especially as I do not know the architecture of this new feature. - This applies only to asynchronously handled things, it seems? So things like control blocks modified by stsch/msch/etc does not need special treatment? - What about channel measurements? Or are they not supported? - What about CHSCs? Or would only asynchronous commands (which we currently don't implement in QEMU) need special treatment?

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV

Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the terminology used. * Protected Virtualization (PV): Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest that operates in PV