search for: chrony

...t exactly what i meant. > > >>> > > > >that joined to an Existing Active Directory (Windows > > > > > > > > 2012R2 server). > > > > The question is about Time Synchronization across the domain. > > > > How should I configure chrony v3.2 in order to provide time > > > > > > > synchronization: > > > apt-get purge chrony > > > apt-get install ntp > > > > > > then read this: > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation > > &gt...

Debian was the first ... http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/c/chrony/chrony_3.0-4+deb9u1_changelog chrony (3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Import upstream version 3.0: - Please see /usr/share/doc/chrony/changelog.gz for the release notes. * Merge branch “experimental”: - Enable support for MS-SNTP authentication in Samba. Current version : chrony (...

By the way there is ntpsigndsocket option in chrony configuration file. https://chrony.tuxfamily.org/doc/3.3/chrony.conf.html#ntpsigndsocket Can you please look at https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Setting_up_a_samba-ad-dc and may be https://chrony.tuxfamily.org/comparison.html ? On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:32 PM Rowland Penny via samba <samba at l...

He Rowland/list, Not that im pro chrony, i still preffer ntp. If everybody with an os below test this, and report back like below, then all settings are findable through the list. Please review / check it. Requirements, chrony 3.x+, this is depends on distro version. Debian 9 : 3.0 checked - done - OK Ubuntu 17.10 : 3.1 Ubuntu 1...

...8 04:59:55 +0200 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > Perhaps when everyone has cooled down a little we can get the Samba > wiki page updated with this information? Sorry, but no, I don't think this is a good idea (yet), most distros do not have a new enough version of chrony for it to work. Put it on the Samba wiki that you can use chrony instead of ntp and most users will miss that you need a version of chrony that their distro cannot supply. Rowland

...ynchronizing time with the >> server. I'm not sure why not. >> >> My setup is a bit special in that the DC is running inside a (privileged) >> linux container. > This may or may not lead to a solution as I'm not running the DC in a > privileged container. I run chrony on the host with the socket inside > the container. > chrony.conf on the host contains: > ================== > ntpsigndsocket /mnt/containers/dc/rootfs/usr/local/samba/var/lib/ntp_signd > ================== > > And the DC looks for the socket at (the default location, no statem...

...an be on any DC. > >>> >>>Yes, you are right. That exactly what i meant. >>> > >that joined to an Existing Active Directory (Windows > > 2012R2 server). > > The question is about Time Synchronization across the domain. > > How should I configure chrony v3.2 in order to provide time > > synchronization: > > apt-get purge chrony > apt-get install ntp > > then read this: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation > > Rowland > >>> >>>I read this article. >>>But unfortunate...

I have read: http://thegeekdiary.com/centos-rhel-7-chrony-vs-ntp-differences-between-ntpd-and-chronyd/ My server is up all the time and will serve time to internal systems (via DHCP options). Caveat is that my server is an armv7 (Cubieboard2) which does not have an RTC (no battery). So whenever the system boots, the time is ZERO (Dec 31, 1969 or som...

Hallo, what is the standard way to sync time under Centos 7. ntp or chrony. Thanks for a short hint. Ralf

On 19.01.2025 17:30, Sonic via samba wrote: > When I first did a Samba upgrade to 4.19.3 on Debian Bookworm back in > December of 2023 Chrony was working just fine for a natural domain time > sync to the DC - no special config or GPO necessary. So after seeing this > thread I decided to see what was different about my configuration that > allowed it to work so seamlessly and I was shocked that it no longer does. > I don't...

> Date: Sunday, February 05, 2017 10:26:05 -0500 > From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> > > I have read: > http://thegeekdiary.com/centos-rhel-7-chrony-vs-ntp-differences-bet > ween-ntpd-and-chronyd/ > > My server is up all the time and will serve time to internal > systems (via DHCP options). > > Caveat is that my server is an armv7 (Cubieboard2) which does not > have an RTC (no battery). So whenever the system boots, the...

On 05/02/17 16:15, Richard wrote: > >> Date: Sunday, February 05, 2017 10:26:05 -0500 >> From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> >> >> I have read: >> http://thegeekdiary.com/centos-rhel-7-chrony-vs-ntp-differences-bet >> ween-ntpd-and-chronyd/ >> >> My server is up all the time and will serve time to internal >> systems (via DHCP options). >> >> Caveat is that my server is an armv7 (Cubieboard2) which does not >> have an RTC (no battery). So whene...

On 5/24/2015 12:22 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 05/24/2015 11:41 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote: >> to activate your selected daemon. I just used the new systemd commands, >> thinking that would be enough. So I tried that and rebooted. Nope, same >> problem: > > chronyd and ntpd both use UDP port 123, so each will terminate the > other when it starts. If both are enabled, chronyd's unit file > indicates that it should start after ntpd, so it will always "win." > > You probably have both enabled, so the system boots, starts ntpd, then...

On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 17:51:54 +0100 Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On 19.01.2025 17:30, Sonic via samba wrote: > > When I first did a Samba upgrade to 4.19.3 on Debian Bookworm back > > in December of 2023 Chrony was working just fine for a natural > > domain time sync to the DC - no special config or GPO necessary. So > > after seeing this thread I decided to see what was different about > > my configuration that allowed it to work so seamlessly and I was > > shocked that it no long...

...different from the ones >> on the host). > Oh yes, you're right. I am running privileged containers. LXC > containers using Debian (both host and containers). > >> It seems like this would be worth a shot if no one else comes up with a >> better solution. I never used chrony before, how do you tell it not to >> try and change the system time? Can you share your whole conf file? > I want it to keep (update/change if/when needed) the system time - > it's running on the host OS, not in the container. I'm just placing > the socket inside the containe...

...vailable. Any ideas? Thanks, Jonathan Kreider On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 5:48 PM Jonathan Kreider <jonathan.kreider at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Robert & Marco. > > @Robert - I tried your solution, but couldn't get it to work because my > host is ubuntu 16.04 and the chrony version for this is too old to support > the ntpsigndsocket option. > > @Marco - your response got me searching in another direction. I had tried > ntpd in the container, which LXD did not like. My research turned up that > Ubuntu now strongly favors chrony as of 18.04 AND that chron...

I have update the Time Synchronisation Wikipage: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Time_Synchronisation It now includes information for the 'chrony' time server. If you spot any errors or omissions, or if you think that something could be said better, please report back ;-) Could I also thank Louis Van Belle for proofreading the page. Rowland

Hi I'm running samba 4.7.6 on ubuntu 18.04 as (backup / secondary) domain controller that joined to an Existing Active Directory (Windows 2012R2 server). The question is about Time Synchronization across the domain. How should I configure chrony v3.2 in order to provide time synchronization: 1. between main Windows DC and Samba DC 2. Between Samba DC and windows clients in case when Windows DC is unavailable -- *Alexei*

On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 16:27 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 24/10/2019 16:10, S?rgio Basto via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > As Centos 7 and Fedora defaults to chronyd [2] , should I use ntpd > > for > > some reason [3] ? I based my configurations on [1] which use ntpd > > ... > > but I thinking change for chronyd , change ntp deamons could outage > > the > > samba service and client computers ? > > > There should b...

...> On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 17:51:54 +0100 > Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 19.01.2025 17:30, Sonic via samba wrote: >>> When I first did a Samba upgrade to 4.19.3 on Debian Bookworm back >>> in December of 2023 Chrony was working just fine for a natural >>> domain time sync to the DC - no special config or GPO necessary. So >>> after seeing this thread I decided to see what was different about >>> my configuration that allowed it to work so seamlessly and I was >>> shocked tha...