search for: chmarks

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "chmarks".

2009 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] make-test dependencies on local directory
Hi, I am getting this when running make-test :- $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure checking for spec95 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/ben chmarks/spec95/benchspec checking for spec2000 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b enchmarks/speccpu2000/benchspec checking for spec2006 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b enchmarks/speccpu2006/benchspec checking for povray benchmark sources... no, not found i...
2006 Feb 25
0
neverending i2/lighttpd problems
So after recompiling ruby a few times to get ssl and readline working, fighting with lighty for awhile, and learning a bit more about linux in the process, I think I''m really close to getting i2 up and running. However, when I try to access my wiki, I get either a blank page or an error 500 and the stack trace below gets sent to the log. If I can''t get this working soon
2009 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] make-test dependencies on local directory
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. Aaron > > On Fe...
2009 Feb 23
0
[LLVMdev] make-test dependencies on local directory
These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:02 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting this when runni...
2009 Feb 23
0
[LLVMdev] make-test dependencies on local directory
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > >> These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the >> legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from >> another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> > > > Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. &gt...
2009 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] make-test dependencies on local directory
On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> > > Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. > > And Vi...
2008 Oct 08
0
RangeError (bignum too big to convert into `long'
I have written the following function in RoR for my website . The function on execution gives an error for the Rmagick crop method , the error is wriiten after the function . I am using the same function(except for the change in name, rest everything is same) for cropping from left , right and bottom and they are working fine. All the left , right , top and bottomcrop functions are given the same
2009 Feb 23
0
[LLVMdev] make-test dependencies on local directory
...Gray wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com<mailto:aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com>> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com<mailto:dalej at apple.com>> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> > > Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. > > And Vi...
2020 Aug 18
7
[RFC] Switching to MemorySSA-backed Dead Store Elimination (aka cross-bb DSE)
...to start working towards switching to use MemorySSA-backed DSE as default. TLDR: MemorySSA DSE can substantially increase the number of stores eliminated in many cases (e.g. across MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 with -O3 -flto, the number of eliminated stores increases roughly by 45%, with some benchmarks seeing much larger improvements). But the improvements come at additional compile-time cost (CTmark geomean -O3 +0.86%, ReleaseThinLTO +1.59%), due to a substantially increased search space. I’d like to propose to switch to MemorySSA-backed DSE, as in my opinion the benefits in terms of store reduc...