search for: chmarking

Hi, I am getting this when running make-test :- $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure checking for spec95 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/ben chmarks/spec95/benchspec checking for spec2000 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b enchmarks/speccpu2000/benchspec checking for spec2006 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b

.../action_controller/bas e.rb:853:in `perform_action_without_filters'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/fil ters.rb:332:in `perform_action_without_benchmark'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/ben chmarking.rb:69:in `perform_action_without_rescue'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:293:in `measure'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/ben chmarking.rb:69:in `perform_action_without_rescue'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ac...

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. Aaron > >

These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:02 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting this when running make-test :- > > $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure > checking for

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > >> These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the >> legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from >> another source, you need to configure

On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have

...s/actionpack-2.1.1/lib/ action_controller/fil ters.rb:579:in `call_filters'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.1/lib/ action_controller/fil ters.rb:572:in `perform_action_without_benchmark'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.1/lib/ action_controller/ben chmarking.rb:68:in `perform_action_without_rescue'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:293:in `measure'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.1/lib/ action_controller/ben chmarking.rb:68:in `perform_action_without_rescue'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1...

Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com<mailto:aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com>> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com<mailto:dalej at apple.com>> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with

Hi, Over the past six months, a MemorySSA-backed DSE implementation has been added to LLVM and it now covers almost all cases the existing DSE implementation does, plus adding a major new capability: eliminating stores across basic blocks. Thanks everyone involved with reviews, testing & patches! I think now would be a good time to start working towards switching to use MemorySSA-backed DSE