search for: chmark

Hi, I am getting this when running make-test :- $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure checking for spec95 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/ben chmarks/spec95/benchspec checking for spec2000 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b enchmarks/speccpu2000/benchspec checking for spec2006 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b enchmarks/speccpu2006/benchsp...

..._controller.rb:7:in `premiere'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/bas e.rb:853:in `perform_action_without_filters'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/fil ters.rb:332:in `perform_action_without_benchmark'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/ben chmarking.rb:69:in `perform_action_without_rescue'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:293:in `measure'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.11.2/lib/action_controller/be...

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. Aaron > > On F...

These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:02 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting this when runn...

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > >> These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the >> legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from >> another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> > > > Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. &g...

On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> > wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> > > Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. > > And V...

...ler/bas e.rb:1166:in `perform_action_without_filters'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.1/lib/ action_controller/fil ters.rb:579:in `call_filters'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.1/lib/ action_controller/fil ters.rb:572:in `perform_action_without_benchmark'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.1/lib/ action_controller/ben chmarking.rb:68:in `perform_action_without_rescue'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/benchmark.rb:293:in `measure'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.1.1/lib/ action_controller/ben chmarking....

...Gray wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com<mailto:aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com>> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com<mailto:dalej at apple.com>> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> > > Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. > > And V...

...to start working towards switching to use MemorySSA-backed DSE as default. TLDR: MemorySSA DSE can substantially increase the number of stores eliminated in many cases (e.g. across MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 with -O3 -flto, the number of eliminated stores increases roughly by 45%, with some benchmarks seeing much larger improvements). But the improvements come at additional compile-time cost (CTmark geomean -O3 +0.86%, ReleaseThinLTO +1.59%), due to a substantially increased search space. I’d like to propose to switch to MemorySSA-backed DSE, as in my opinion the benefits in terms of store redu...