Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "chisqtest".
2012 May 21
3
Replace a variable by its value
I have a dataset called "raw-data" . I am trying to use the following code -
col_name<-names(raw_data)
for (i in 1:(length(names(raw_data))-2))
{
tbl=table(raw_data$Pay.Late.Dummy, raw_data$col_name[i])
chisqtest<-chisq.test(tbl)
}
Say the 1st column of my raw_data is Column1. The idea is when i=1 then
raw_data$col_name[i] will automatically become raw_data$Column1 , which is
not happening. Kindly help?
--
View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Replace-a-variable-by-its-value-tp46...
1997 Aug 21
2
R-alpha: new class for chisquare tests?
...t, but I
think Peter is with me when I say that this is not the right thing in an
intro course.)
* Should we extend print.htest() to display info on expected and
observed counts in case it is there?
* (Should we have an extra argument to control this behavior?)
* Or should there be a class "chisqtest" with a slightly different print
and perhaps also summary method?
* Or ...?
-k
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]sub...
1997 Aug 22
0
R-alpha: class for chisquare tests; Thoughts on print & summary
...use thats what I'm
teaching at present. I have an "lm.predict" about ready to roll,
but am a bit hung up on trying to propagate case names through
"model.frame", which in turn is inducing an sidetrack into
[<- etc etc ...
alternatively, you would make a new class 'chisqtest' but give
your test results BOTH classes
class(res) <- c("chisqtest","htest")
Such that you can use 'htest' methods in general, and just one
print.chisqtest
in particular.
I'd probably try to avoid making a separate class for every kind of
test resul...
2008 Jan 11
1
glht() and contrast() comparison
...lt;-2*(type=='m')+4*(type=='t')+rnorm(240,100,20)
dat<-cbind(as.data.frame(y),type=type,batch=batch)
rm(batch,type,y)
library(nlme)
dat.lme<-lme(y~type, random=~1|batch/type, data=dat)
library(multcomp)
summary(glht(dat.lme, linfct = mcp(type
=c("b+t-2*m=0"))),test=Chisqtest())
library(contrast)
contrast(dat.lme, a=list(type=c('b','t')),
b=list(type='m'),type='average')
Does anybody have a clue?
Thanks,
John
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. M...
2012 Apr 16
0
warning message: coxme with package multcomp
...9992574 0.0003999703
r.worker Intercept 0.0199992574 0.0003999703
to see if removal is overall dependend upon treatment i use the package
multcomp as following with the second warning message:
pp.coxme.glht<-glht(pp.coxme,linfct=mcp(treatment="Tukey"))
summary(pp.coxme.glht,test=Chisqtest())
General Linear Hypotheses
Multiple Comparisons of Means: Tukey Contrasts
Linear Hypotheses:
Estimate
tx - meta == 0 -22.1626
uv - meta == 0 -0.6932
uv - tx == 0 21.4694
Global Test:
Chisq DF Pr(>Chisq)
1 71.94 1 2.217e-17
Warning message:
In cov2cor(cov...