search for: chipsets

Is this expected result for Chipset: G98 (NV98)? $ modinfo nvidia -F version 304.123 $ stat -c %s mmiotrace.log 134659197 $ file mmiotrace.log mmiotrace.log: ASCII text $ grep -i lost mmiotrace.log ; echo $? 1 $ ./envytools/rnn/demmio -f mmiotrace.log | perl -e 'open($fh409c, ">fuc409c"); open($fh409d, ">fuc409d"); open($fh41ac, ">fuc41ac");

This removes dependence on external firmware for NV50 generation cards. If the generated ctxprogs don't work for you for some reason, please report it. Signed-off-by: Marcin Ko?cielnicki <koriakin at 0x04.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c | 74 +-

4.1.8-200.fc22.x86_64 dmesg: [ 11.809467] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:02:00.0] BOOT0 : 0x098200a2 [ 11.809493] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:02:00.0] Chipset: G98 (NV98) [ 11.809508] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:02:00.0] Family : NV50 4.3.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc24.x86_64 dmesg: [ 2.483843] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: NVIDIA G98 (098200a2) Where vanished these Chipset & Family super cool lines?

Hello poma, The chipset didn't disappear and is still displayed: it is the G98 you get on the "[ 2.483843] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: NVIDIA G98 (098200a2)" line. The "NV98" was the "Nouveau" chipset, but the switch was made to use the same naming as NVIDIA. So rather than displaying both the Nouveau version of the chipset and the NVIDIA one, it make sense to only

...specification updates: The Linux solution keys off of device IDs 3403 and 3406, as listed in the specification update, but this way fails to cover the X58 chipset, which has - under different numbers (62 and 69) - the same errata (the Linux commit message also only mentions erratum 53 for the 55x0 chipsets, albeit I believe 47 is as much of an issue there as it is for Xen). The Xen solution keys off of ID 342e, with no explanation in the commit description on where this association comes from. I therefore wonder whether - the Xen solution may have false positives - the Linux solution would still ha...

On 02.12.2014 14:40, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:38 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: >> Is this expected result for Chipset: G98 (NV98)? > > Yep, 100% expected. [Perhaps you might glance at the wiki page you got > that from for clues as to why.] > "You basically never need to do the mmiotrace, unless you're a nouveau

(lspci-output added at the end of this mail!) Hi specialists, I''m trying to pass an HP Surestore USB-drive to a domU. I''m hiding the pci-device in the dom0, and capturing it in the domU. Although this works fine I receive the following lines in /var/log/syslog of the dom0 after a reboot ======================================================================= Aug 8

...upport for IOMMU IO virtualization (VT-d)!". It is ironic because the i55x0 chipset only supports Intel 5500 and 5600 Xeon CPU''s, which according to Intel, do NOT have VT-d support integrated. To my knowledge, Core i7 CPU''s can not be used (in a dual configuration) with i55x0 chipsets. In fact, if one looks at the specs of these 55x0 motherboards, one will only find support for 5500 and 5600 CPU''s. Is it possible that the i55x0 series of chipsets is listed here because it was used with a single i7 CPU? I currently have the EVGA SR-2 motherboard (which is a dual Xeon 55...

Can someone make a recommedation as far as best chipset for Centos 5.0 or 5..1 using a Q6600 series CPU?with chipsets that have onboard VGA?? From poking around it looks like the G33 and P35 are not supported or have problems until the newer 2.6.22 kernel (the?iso's appear to be earlier than that, think it was?.18)?? So I am considering boards with the Intel G965 chipset but not sure if is supported yet? Can...

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:38 AM, poma <pomidorabelisima at gmail.com> wrote: > Is this expected result for Chipset: G98 (NV98)? Yep, 100% expected. [Perhaps you might glance at the wiki page you got that from for clues as to why.] > > $ modinfo nvidia -F version > 304.123 > > $ stat -c %s mmiotrace.log > 134659197 > > $ file mmiotrace.log > mmiotrace.log: ASCII

Hello List, I'm hoping someone else out there has an Asus DSBF-DE server board, and can tell me if anything special needs to be done to get ports 5 and 6 of the onboard SATA to work under Centos 5.1 x64. I have drives on 1 through 4 that are detected and working properly, however, a drive on 5 is not detected, from what i can tell, the kernel doesn't even see phy's for ports 5 and 6.

I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has support for these chipsets be available on any on a Centos mirror? Has the support for these chipsets been added to yum yet? Here are my latest results with these chipsets and Centos 5.1 1. Asus P5K, E6850, P35 Chipset: Does...

Hello all..... I would like to know if anyone here has had good experience with this Supermicro motherboard.....http://supermicro.com/products/motherboard/P4/E7221/P8SCT.cfm I am thinking about using it in an entry level mail and file server with a 3ware card and 200 GB SATA drives. Cost is a factor here otherwise I would go for an Opteron board instead. JC

It seems as though at least the NV44 expects the same format as VP2 does. But NV96 expects the format as currently done. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_video.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_video.h | 2 ++ src/gallium/drivers/nv30/nv30_context.c | 2 ++

Hello, Am Donnerstag, 3. Oktober 2019, 01:10:58 CEST schrieb Akemi Yagi: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:35 PM G?nther J. Niederwimmer <gjn at gjn.priv.at> wrote: > > This Board have 2 Controller!? > > 00:1f.2 RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation C600/X79 series chipset > > SATA > > RAID Controller (rev 06) > > > > On this controller all drives are

Right now the log will output e.g. NVaa instead of NVAA, which is how we usually talk about it. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- src/nv_driver.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/nv_driver.c b/src/nv_driver.c index b83b822..44e7496 100644 --- a/src/nv_driver.c +++ b/src/nv_driver.c @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ NVPreInit(ScrnInfoPtr

The following 2 patches make it possible to run Mesa programs on GK20A (Tegra K1). GK20A is very similar to GK104, but uses a new (backward-compatible) 3D class as well as the same ISA as GK110 (SM35). Taking these differences into account is sufficient to successfully render simple off-screen buffers. Alexandre Courbot (2): nvc0: add GK20A 3D class nvc0: use SM35 ISA with GK20A

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64 Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, We are having a problem on several Supermicro servers (I'll include more details on the configuration later) : when booting Linux 3.2 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 (Wheezy) as a DOM0 on Xen 4.1 (xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64 from Wheezy), the system hangs after : [ 3.716174] scsi1 : ata_piix [

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/chipsets/5520-and-5500-chipset-ioh-specification-update.html Stepping B-3 has two errata (#47 and #53) related to Interrupt remapping, to which the workaround is for the BIOS to completely disable interrupt remapping. These errata are fixed in stepping C-2. Unfortunately this chipset is very common and m...

Hi ,Guys I installed CentOS5.2-x86_64 on my Dell PowerEndger 1950 with virtualization component ,when reboot the system halted at: /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Red Hat nash version 5.1.19.6 usb 1-5: device not accepting address 4 ,error -110 usb 1-5: device not accepting address 5, error -110 usb 1-5: device not accepting address 6,error -110 usb 1-5: device not