Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "chickencha".
2010 May 28
4
[LLVMdev] Manipulating basic blocks with the C bindings
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Evan Shaw <chickencha at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm writing a frontend with the LLVM C bindings for a language that
>> has a goto statement, similar to C's. I'm having some trouble figuring
>> out what to do for the case where the label is declared after the
>> goto, like this:
>&...
2010 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] Manipulating basic blocks with the C bindings
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Evan Shaw <chickencha at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Evan Shaw <chickencha at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm writing a frontend with the LLVM C bindings for a language that
>&...
2010 May 27
0
[LLVMdev] Manipulating basic blocks with the C bindings
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Evan Shaw <chickencha at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm writing a frontend with the LLVM C bindings for a language that
> has a goto statement, similar to C's. I'm having some trouble figuring
> out what to do for the case where the label is declared after the
> goto, like this:
>
> goto label;...
2010 May 27
2
[LLVMdev] Manipulating basic blocks with the C bindings
I'm writing a frontend with the LLVM C bindings for a language that
has a goto statement, similar to C's. I'm having some trouble figuring
out what to do for the case where the label is declared after the
goto, like this:
goto label;
...
label:
...
When I generate the code for the goto, I'd like to create a basic
block that's not inserted anywhere in particular and then put