search for: cherrypy

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "cherrypy".

Did you mean: cherry
2011 Jan 24
0
error xenwebmanager
When i prove from my xenwebmanager interface  to add new server i have this messages [24/Jan/2011:13:13:01] HTTP Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/share/xenwebmanager/cherrypy/_cprequest.py", line 606, in respond     cherrypy.response.body = self.handler()   File "/usr/share/xenwebmanager/cherrypy/_cpdispatch.py", line 25, in __call__     return self.callable(*self.args, **self.kwargs)   File "/usr/bin/xenwebmanager", line 1059, in alerts     lis...
2007 Dec 14
21
Some silly benchs (was: 1.9)
Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8
2005 May 13
45
Why Wouldn't I Use Rails
I am starting a large project and still selecting what framework to use. Rather than ask brand x what is wrong with brand y, I am more interested in self confession. Why would I *not* want to use Rails (compared to Iowa and Nitro). I posted a synopsis of the project to ruby-talk but will repost it here if anyone wants it. xev
2006 Oct 30
0
My showdown: Ruby/Rails, Perl/Catalyst, Python/Turbogears
...was the easiest to get to production than the Apache + mod_proxy + mongrel cluster solution. Using Turbogears (Python) Pretty productive here as well right off the bat. Documentation is sparse at best and this hampers you when you want to step out of the box. Production is pretty easy, using CherryPy and Apache is fairly easy to get going. Turbogears seems to be in perma-beta though. Also its confusing in the sense of which template system you want to use, which ORM to use (SQLAlchemy, SQLOBject, etc.) I wish they would just pick one and stick with it. Rails uses ActiveRecord and thats...
2006 May 30
6
Why would I choose RoR over Turbogears
I''m trying to get some answers as to why I (my company actually) would go with RoR over TurboGears. The developer staff is fluent in both Ruby and Python so that is not an issue. Rails is well into its release cycle whereas Turbogears won''t be at 1.0 until later this week. They both do essentially the same thing and they both have cool features unique to themselves