search for: cherri

...tor, then value is unchanged else, value is changed the the closest element of lookup_vector, "closest" meaning "the one that would come just after if we sorted them using order()" } For example : values <- c("Kiwis", "Bananas", "Ananas", "Cherries", "Peer") vector <- c("Oranges", "Bananas", "Apples", "Cherries", "Lemons") my_match(values, vector) should return : c("Lemons","Bananas","Apples","Cherries",NA) I currently use a home-m...

Tested with 'make check-release'. tests/parallel (in check-slow) failed, although it does regularly and that seems to be because of libvirt. Rich.

On 01/15/2020 05:03 PM, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev wrote: > Tom Stellard told me to use `git cherry-pick -x`, and if you look at the release branches, you can see it is used, although the old style is used as well. I'm not sure what script is being used there. > I recommend updating the merge.sh script to use `git cherry-pick -x` and then deleting the merge-git.sh script. -Tom >

Artem Dergachev via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > If you're doing merge commits, you might lose linear history, but you > obtain another fancy invariant: every piece of work - i.e., every > patch, every merge conflict resolution - appears in the repository > exactly once, under a unique identifier, and the non-linear source > control history becomes an

On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:01 PM, David A. Greene wrote: > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > >> On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:45 PM, greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) wrote: > >>> I'm a little confused. To me "staging" means incremental development, >>> getting things integrated correctly, etc. The final merge to

John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> writes: >> git branch --contains <sha1>, on the other hand, will tell you. > > Of course, this doesn't actually help if you've cherry-picked commits > over to your branch (e.g. because it's a release branch). How is that different from SVN? If revision 1234 fixes a bug is some branch, and the last revision in your trunk

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:01 PM, David A. Greene wrote: > >> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: >> >>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:45 PM, greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) wrote: >> >>>> I'm a little confused. To me "staging" means incremental development,

Hi Michael, Can you please cherry pick r195411 into release-3.4 to fix building on older OS X? Thanks, Jeremy commit e323506316cc3948bd801be537a723c308d8e2d4 Author: Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> Date: Fri Nov 22 05:00:51 2013 +0000 [block-freq] Update data in test case to be unsigned long long to fix mingw build. git-svn-id:

Hi all, I have a very simple problem that I cannot seem to find the answer to. Consider the following toy dataset: x <- read.table(textConnection("V1 apples bananas cherries indv.1 7 8 4 3 indv.2 7 7 4 9"), header = TRUE) How would I change the column name of ONLY the first column, not the others? Surely I should not have to re-specify the names of ALL the columns -- e.g., colnames(x) <- c("pears", "apples", "bananas", "che...

Hi, I am sending this proposal to get feedbacks on how we could make the tagging of bug fixes and regressions more obvious. The idea is to provide easily accessible information to help deciding what to cherry-pick in a release branch. * Context * People shipping compilers based on LLVM may not completely align with the official releases of LLVM. Thus, the stabilization of each custom release

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:04?AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > hello Sean, > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > I'd really prefer this patch (series or single) is not accepted. This > > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:04?AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > hello Sean, > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > I'd really prefer this patch (series or single) is not accepted. This > > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I

Are any plans for an API that would allow ZFS commands including snapshot/rollback integrated with customer''s application? Thanks, Cherry

> On Nov 15, 2019, at 1:52 AM, Alex Denisov <1101.debian at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think I can just get the patch and remove the `llvm` on top of the paths, but that’s not a scalable approach. > > IIRC, the -p option of 'patch' is exactly for doing this. Would that simplify your use-case? > Yes, for a single patch that would work. If there is a way to do

On 5/19/23 18:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > For the series: > > Reviewed-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> Thanks! Commit range 67647b883e13..569bd1dd29da. > > BTW it's usually possible to cherry pick across git repos, eg: > > $ git fetch ../libguestfs > $ git cherry-pick -x <hash> Hm, good to know, thanks! I didn't know

On Jul 22, 2011, at 12:33 AM, Matthieu Moy wrote: > John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> writes: >>> git branch --contains <sha1>, on the other hand, will tell you. >> >> Of course, this doesn't actually help if you've cherry-picked commits >> over to your branch (e.g. because it's a release branch). > > How is that different from SVN?

Package: src:xen Version: 4.17.0+46-gaaf74a532c-1 Severity: important Two major bugs have shown with the release of new hardware from AMD. Since the new hardware is likely to become common during the life of Debian/bookworm, you may wish to grab them early: ad15a0a8ca2515d8ac58edfc0bc1d3719219cb77 x86/time: prevent overflow with high frequency TSCs Turns out the latest generation is fast enough

Now that we’re on the Git monorepo, is there an updated script for cherry-picking commits into the release branch? llvm/utils/release/merge.sh appears to still use SVN, and llvm/utils/release/merge-git.sh uses git-svn. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200116/5c791bd2/attachment.html>

Doe anybody know of a way to redirect both channels from a bridge to different dial plan extensions from the using the AMI. Currently, as soon as I redirect one of the channels the other appears to be dropped and gets reorder tone (congestion, fast busy). I guess what I really need is a way to redirect one of the channels and hold on to the other. Thanks, Neil Cherry

On 13/07/2023 16:09, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 13.07.23 um 16:41 schrieb Sean Paul: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:04?AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig >> <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: >>> >>> hello Sean, >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >>>> I'd really prefer this patch