search for: cherepanov

...i, I believe some Neon code doesn't get invoked properly, because all PRESUME macros were set in my build. Probably not all optimized functions are called directly under iOS. Regards, Victor -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Lennox Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 11:59 AM To: Victor Cherepanov Cc: opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] NEON detection under iOs On iOS, configure should define OPUS_ARM_PRESUME_NEON and OPUS_ARM_PRESUME_NEON_INTR if you’re building for armv7, and OPUS_ARM_PRESUME_NEON_INTR for arm64 (since every Apple armv7 CPU has supported Neon, and of course arm64 supp...

Hi, Thank you for a great work. Opus codec works great under many platforms. I have found a small performance issue under iOS platform. If the macro OPUS_HAVE_RTCD is not set, then encoder doesn't use some _neon functions at low bitrates (up to 64k). If the macro is set, then the compiler hits the error at opus/celt/arm/armcpu.c:153 (a function for detection missed). Being compared to Android

Hello Alexander, > Interesting topic. Is any such optimization reachable from C? Yes, I think so - both PassBuilder and PassManagerBuilder add MemCpyOpt & IPSCCP in the default pass pipeline. Juneyoung On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 8:43 PM Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root at openwall.com> wrote: > On 19/08/2020 06.05, Juneyoung Lee via llvm-dev wrote: > > LangRef isn't clear about the value of padding when an aggregate value is > > stored into memory, and I'd like to suggest that storing an aggregate > fills > > paddin...

...es/samba/samdb.py", line 672, in dsdb_normalise_attributes return dsdb._dsdb_normalise_attributes(ldb, ldap_display_name, ldif_elements) What policy of using new version of libraries for stable version of Samba? Can I fix domain provision with talloc-2.1.6 for samba-4.3.6? -- Andrey Cherepanov cas at altlinux.org

...e disappearing so rapidly that nobody >> cares too much about this issue, Please note that there is a whole new 32-bit architecture -- x32. >> but this blog post is still worth reading: >> >> http://trust-in-soft.com/objects-larger-than-ptrdiff_max-bytes/ -- Alexander Cherepanov

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexander Cherepanov <ch3root at openwall.com> wrote: > On 2016-05-20 19:58, David Majnemer via llvm-dev wrote: > >> I've come across this issue before and came to the following conclusion: >> - We are not obligated to support objects that large, C11 5.2.4.1/1 only >> requires that we...

...xpert here, but I think > Samba relies on the builtin version of Samba. It's good practice for shared libraries: $ apt-cache whatdepends libtalloc | grep '^ [a-z]' | wc -l 57 It is used for samba and samba-DC, sssd and openchange, cifs-utils and sogo-openchange-backend -- Andrey Cherepanov cas at altlinux.org

...ne 5 Modify failed after processing 0 records This is new error: why GUID for _removed_ attribute is checked? BTW ldbedit is allows to remove this attribute. Anyone knows how to fix this errors? I try to prepare patch for second fatal error at least, but I'm newbie for Samba code. -- Andrey Cherepanov ALT Linux cas at altlinux.ru -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20150619/bcc77aaa/attachment.pg...

Hello all, LangRef isn't clear about the value of padding when an aggregate value is stored into memory, and I'd like to suggest that storing an aggregate fills padding with undef. Here are a few clues that supports this change: - According to C17, the value of padding bytes when storing values in structures or unions is unspecified. - IPSCCP ignores padding and directly stores a

...ram xsltApplyXSLTTemplate: A potential infinite template recursion was detected. You can adjust xsltMaxDepth (--maxdepth) in order to raise the maximum number of nested template calls and variables/params (currently set to 3000). Build with --maxdepth 99999 failed too. Any suggestions? -- Andrey Cherepanov ALT Linux cas at altlinux.ru

...tax is different). This should be slightly faster than using RTCD, since the Neon functions can be direct calls instead of indirect ones. Do those defines not get set for you, or is there some Neon code that doesn’t get invoked properly with the PRESUMEs? > On May 24, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Victor Cherepanov <victor.v.cherepanov at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you for a great work. Opus codec works great under many platforms. > I have found a small performance issue under iOS platform. > If the macro OPUS_HAVE_RTCD is not set, then encoder doesn't use some _neon fun...

On 12/03/16 14:20, Andrey Cherepanov wrote: > I build new version of talloc-2.1.6 (build from external tarball) and > samba-4.3.6. > But if I provision domain by command > > samba-tool domain provision --realm=test.alt --domain test > --adminpass='Pa$$word' --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --server-role=dc &gt...

On 17:21:44 wrote Andrey Cherepanov: > I build new version of talloc-2.1.6 (build from external tarball) and > samba-4.3.6. > But if I provision domain by command > > samba-tool domain provision --realm=test.alt --domain test > --adminpass='Pa$$word' --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL --server-role=dc > --use-...

...# samba-tool group listmembers aaa -Uadministrator # There is no memberOf fields in sam.ldb for user 'cas': # LDB_MODULES_PATH=/usr/lib64/samba/ldb ldbsearch \ > -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(cn=cas)' \ > memberOf | grep ^memberOf # What's wrong? -- Andrey Cherepanov ALT Linux cas at altlinux.ru

Hi all, I'm wondering which version of Active Directory Samba4 can simulate. Of course we know Samba4 is not yet able to simulate the whole AD, things are still missing as Trust Relationship to name one, but for things which are working, until which version of Windows Server / AD can we compare Samba4 / AD? Hoping this question was clear enough... Thanks and regards, mathias

I've come across this issue before and came to the following conclusion: - We are not obligated to support objects that large, C11 5.2.4.1/1 only requires that we support objects of size 65535! Their guidance for maximum object size is stated to be half of SIZE_MAX in C11 K.3.4/4 which is typically equivalent to PTRDIFF_MAX. - The expectation that PTRDIFF_MAX is more or less a proxy for the

It could be that 32-bit systems are disappearing so rapidly that nobody cares too much about this issue, but this blog post is still worth reading: http://trust-in-soft.com/objects-larger-than-ptrdiff_max-bytes/ John

Hi, I was looking into the semantics of GEP inbounds and some BasicAA rules and I'm wondering if it's valid in LLVM IR to allocate more than half of the address space with a global variable or an alloca. If that's a scenario want to consider, then we have problems :) Consider this C code (32 bits): #include <string.h> char obj[0x80000008]; char f() { char *p = obj +

????????????. ????????? ?????????? ?? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ? ???????? ???????????? ????! ??? ???????? ????? ?????????: - ????? ????? ????? ???????? - ??????????? ????????? - ?????????? ?? ??????? - ????????? ??????? ?????? ? ?????????? ????????? ?? ?????? - ?????? ?????????? ?? ?????? - ????????, ??????? ?? ???????? ? ??? ????????? ????????? ???????? ??????? ?? ???? ??????. ???? ???? ????