Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "checksym".
Did you mean:
checksum
2015 Aug 22
2
a lld linker script bug
Hi,
Thanks for your patch, Huang. It looks good to me. Just one comment:
can you write a testcase, similar to the others used for linker script
testing, with your example? Alternatively, you can modify
lld/test/elf/linkerscript/sections-with-wildcards.test to test your
case. This will make your patch complete and ready for commit, and
will ensure we do not regress on this bug if this code is ever
2005 Aug 18
2
Question and feature requests for processor bound systems
..., but no updates of blocks in-place. This
would also help on systems that are disk-bound in addition to being network
and cpu-bound in that it doesn't have to read every block of the file to
send checksums.
Option 3: Add an option, maybe --checksum-block-bytes=N, that would tell
rsync to only checksym the first N bytes of every block. This would
probably be used with a very large --block-size. This would be a hint that
the file should have no insertions or deletions of data, but only in-place
updates with large blocks, or possibly appended additions. This also would
help disk-bound systems....