search for: checksummari

The major changes for R 2.0.0 are now in place, and we have provided a set of notes for package maintainers at http://developer.r-project.org/200update.txt on both changes needed and new opportunities. The main thing which needs to be done is to revise the DESCRIPTION file, in particular to ensure the Depends: field is accurate. We do run daily checks over all the CRAN packages. See

Maybe somebody can help me with the following questions: I have submitted Rmetrics to the CRAN server and was looking what happened. 1) The */contrib/checkSummary.html shows a table which reports the daily package check results. For my packages there is no entry in the column "r-devel", the other packages have "OK" or "WARN". What does it mean? 2) The link to

Professor Ripley thanks for this. Very much appreciated. The original subject line reflected my late-night conviction that the answer might involve passing a strange list to do.call(). Anyway, package magic is broken (only in R-devel, I might add) because I have a function called "%eq%". R-2.0.0 CMD check is stopping (I think) because it interprets the "%" as a

Hi, I was just looking at the "CRAN Daily Package Check Results" [http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/checkSummary.html], and realized there are 1000 packages on CRAN as of today (look at row 3 in the table below). Yet another quite extraordinary milestone in R history. Last updated on 2007-04-12 11:48:32 Results for installing and checking packages using the three current flavors

Please forgive me if you already received this. I had an e-mail sending glitch this morning. http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/checkSummary.html reported an error in Design.trans.Rd * checking Rd files ... ERROR Rd files with syntax errors: /var/mnt/hda3/R.check/r-devel/PKGS/Design/man/Design.trans.Rd: unterminated section 'alias' The .Rd file is attached. It begins

Dear RNetCDF developers, I haven't been able to load RNetCDF in R for a while. I wonder if this is a bug or a problem with my installation. I'm using Debian testing. > library(RNetCDF) Segmentation fault 5:01pm(dongda)~>R --version R 2.2.0 (2005-10-06). Copyright (C) 2005 R Development Core Team R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to

OK guys another problem. I have a 3D array "x" with dim(x)=c(a,a,b^2) and I want to rearrange the elements of x to make a matrix "y" with dimensions c(a*b,a*b). Neither a nor b is known in advance. I want the "n-th" a*a submatrix of y to be x[,,n] (where 1 <= n <= b^2). Needless to say, this has gotta be vectorized! Toy example with a=2, b=3 follows:

Are there many packages that are orphaned, and have a better "half" much like bootstrap? Is there a listing, or directory of "recommended" packages (other than the packages downloaded with the initial R install)? Thanks, Neil Eastep. An "R" newbie ----------- Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> writes: >>Package bootstrap is orphaned, that

Hello, I am just studying the following example from vignette: strucchange-intro, contineousely ending up in an error. This is the given code: 1. library(strucchange) 2. data(USIncExp) 3. if (!"package:stats" %in% search()) library(ts) 4. USIncExp2 <- window(USIncExp, start = c(1985, 12)) A.Modelling: coint.res <- residuals(lm(expenditure ~ income, data = USIncExp2))

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hypatia.math.ethz.ch id i2MH38ro020355 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on hypatia.math.ethz.ch X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no

Dear all, I am beginner using R. I have a question about it. When you use it, since it is written by so many authors, how do you know that the results are trustable?(I don't want to affend anyone, also I trust people). But I think this should be a question. Thanks, Ming

Dear all, I am beginner using R. I have a question about it. When you use it, since it is written by so many authors, how do you know that the results are trustable?(I don't want to affend anyone, also I trust people). But I think this should be a question. Thanks, Ming