search for: checkins

I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get this error: /Users/bocchino/llvm-checkin/src/include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h: In static member function 'static bool llvm::DbgInfoIntrinsic::classof (const llvm::IntrinsicInst*)': /Users/bocchino/llvm-checkin/src/include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h:77: error: 'dbg_declare' is not a member of 'llvm::Intrinsic'

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get this error: Are you sure that no conflicts prevented updating from going smoothly? How are you building (srcdir ==/!= objdir)? -Chris > /Users/bocchino/llvm-checkin/src/include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h: In static > member function 'static bool

I did a utils/cvsupdate, and there are no conflicts. srcdir != objdir. This is on persephone. Are you not getting this error? Perhaps I should check out a fresh tree and try to compile it? Rob On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:40 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: >> I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get >> this

Hi. My model data is the following: - Place - User - Checkin Instead of having a Checkin that belongs to both User and Place, I chose to add another model, Program, that allows to list all the places a user can checkin into, and also hide the checkins he''s no longer involved in (= the user sign out of a specific program). That give me crazy relationships: Program has_many Checkin (and a double belongs_to Place and User) Checkin belongs_to Program User has_many Program Place has_many Program Place has_many Checkin through Program In or...

I've done several CVS head builds today .. no problems on Linux. Reid. On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 11:53 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > > > I did a utils/cvsupdate, and there are no conflicts. srcdir != objdir. This > > is on persephone. > > > > Are you not getting this error? Perhaps I should check out a fresh

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > I did a utils/cvsupdate, and there are no conflicts. srcdir != objdir. This > is on persephone. > > Are you not getting this error? Perhaps I should check out a fresh tree and > try to compile it? Nope, I don't think anyone else is getting this error. If you could try a fresh build that would be great, I'll fire

Hey, There are some patches I''ve and a bunch of other work that I forsee coming that will mean more patches. I was wondering what the process is of getting checkin access for the Xen tree? P.S. ''konradwilk'' is the account name.

I'm guessing the problem occurred because I hadn't updated in a while (maybe a couple of weeks?) and I had an old Intrinsics.gen file hanging around in my source directory that was getting picked up by the makefile for some reason. This is a bug, but maybe it's harmless because there's a onetime workaround (delete the file by hand) and it won't be a problem for

I've seen a number of corrupted-index problems pop up on our test-dovecot servers (used by a few people at the office), and I'm wondering why corrupt indices don't just automatically get deleted ? Something like: if (!MAIL_INDEX_IS_IN_MEMORY(index)) { unlink(index->filepath); } in src/lib-index/mail-index.c:mail_index_set_error() comes to mind. It

...format in checkin descriptions such that the commit email machinery hyperlinks to the actual bug, perhaps? (I haven't looked at the bug tracking system in detail - I hope it gets some kind of link to details about which checkin/revision number fixes a bug, too. So that you can go from revisions/checkins to bugs and bugs to revisions again)

Checkin 1.37 of src/lib-storage/mail-storage.c added a parameter to mailbox_open() but this broke building src/deliver/deliver.c as revision 1.2 doesn't use the new parameter. It looks like save_mail() of src/deliver/deliver.c calls mailbox_open() and it looks like it might work fine if it were to use a (struct istream *)0 as the third parameter (instead of the flags) -- but I don't use

SWIG 1.3.29 isn''t going to cut it for us. We''ll have to wait until 1.3.30, unless I can hack together a nasty workaround for a problem with the object tracking. It seem that each SWIG module gets its own hash for tracking objects. This means that, for example, you create a find dialog (in FindReplaceDialog.cpp) events you get from it (from FindDialogEvent.cpp)

On Apr 7, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > Can you please just respond to the specific patch on llvm-commits > instead > of emailing llvm-dev? Don't happen to know which checkin caused it...

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:33:17AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > I have checked in a few changes worth noting: > > > > 1. I split the file decoder into a more general 'seekable > > stream decoder' which, makes the file decoder just a special > > case of the seekable stream decoder. this is useful

Hi I would like to ask how to configure the email address that will email to me and to the person who has checked in the files that has broken the build. //Currently the email is fixed in the configfile with me as the sole address project.email_notifier.emails = [''me at myemailaddress.com''] Does anybody know how to change the email address dynamically following a build fail

I have checked in a few changes worth noting: 1. I split the file decoder into a more general 'seekable stream decoder' which, makes the file decoder just a special case of the seekable stream decoder. this is useful in situations where you are trying to add decoding support to something that has abstracted the file away. the file decoder interface is still identical, it is all backward

I''d like to change the rspec directory structure from /spec /model /controllers etc to /spec /unit /models /controllers /lib /functional /models /controllers etc. Basically the Jay Fields style of testing -- I want the unit tests to be run all the time on a continuous integration server, but the integration/functional and system tests to be run

On Tuesday 02 August 2005 10:42, Xen patchbot -unstable wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User smh22@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk > # Node ID 59e76450e286240decceda23eca343ec4604124f > # Parent 48dea637aac96bcbabe788d036b52570520cc82e > Fixes. Sorry, but could we not make checkin comments like "Fixes."? It would just take a few more seconds to describe it in a complete

I have in my working directory the trivial header changes necessary to allow FLAC library functions to be used in C++ programs. Is it OK to commit this? -- - mdz -------------- next part -------------- ? Makefile ? Makefile.in ? ordinals.h Index: file_decoder.h =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/flac/flac/include/FLAC/file_decoder.h,v

OK, when I copy $(SRCDIR)/include/llvm/Intrinsics.gen to $(OBJDIR)/ include/llvm/ by hand after building (and failing) once, the build succeeds. This is definitely a makefile bug. Rob On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:40 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: >> I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get >> this error: > >