search for: checkers

Dear list, we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5 Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are already seen by multipathd. Problem is, that the Sun 7310 has two storage heads which run in

...ack function scopes, but if fairly old but recently reincarnated patches [1] and [2] land any time soon, we may get a much better granularity), how easy would it be to track objects when they are moved or lifetime-extended by binding to references, which was a large problem for other C++ object checkers, but we may work our way around it to some extent (or do it properly, depending on my current work outlined in [3] and in follow-up mails in February), and also how helpful inlining would be (eg. would we be able to automagically support string_view-like classes by inlining their methods?). So...

...but if fairly old but recently > reincarnated patches [1] and [2] land any time soon, we may get a much > better granularity), how easy would it be to track objects when they are > moved or lifetime-extended by binding to references, which was a large > problem for other C++ object checkers, but we may work our way around it > to some extent (or do it properly, depending on my current work outlined > in [3] and in follow-up mails in February), and also how helpful > inlining would be (eg. would we be able to automagically support > string_view-like classes by inlining...

Hi Ted and Others , We we use the switch "--analyze" for clang ,Did all checkers that were pop up from the command "clang -cc1 -analyzer-checker-help" where enabled by default or some are ???? Any documents which says about this ,FYI we referred the information @ http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/checker_dev_manual.html,But unlucky we couldn't find any points w.r....

Hello, I'm Paul Semel, a French student in computer science. I am currently in my 4th year (1st year of graduate school) at EPITA and enrolled in the system and security laboratory of the school. I would be very interested in working on a LLVM project during this GSoC. Implementing a PoC for an unsequenced modification checker in CSA helped me discover LLVM. However, I would like to

I''m new to Ruby and RoR; I was messing around with it today and had trouble with error codes. Specifically, the ruby syntax checker frequently spits out ''syntax error'' with the last line of the code as the error line (the error is nowhere near the last line). This is something I''d expect in a pre 1.0 version, but ruby is at 1.8.4, is the ruby syntax

For a change, I am going to try and check the checksum before burning the CDs.... My burner is on a Win2000 box, and I have all 6 of the Centos 5 ISO images there already. So I grab a checker from: http://www.diamondcs.com.au/freeutilities/md5.php And checking the ISO image files with this program, I get different numbers than in the MD5 hash txt file. Can anyone point me to a

Hey, On 02/20/2018 11:51 PM, Paul Semel wrote: > Hello, > > > I'm Paul Semel, a French student in computer science. I am currently in > my 4th year (1st year of graduate school) at EPITA and enrolled in the > system and security laboratory of the school. > > I would be very interested in working on a LLVM project during this > GSoC. Implementing a PoC for an

Hi, I am sharing the proposal [0] which gives a brief introduction for the implementation of the LLVM DI Checker utility. On a very high level, it is a pair of LLVM (IR) Passes that check the preservation of the original debug info in the optimizations. There are options controlling the passes, that could be invoked from ``clang`` as well as from ``opt`` level. By testing the utility on the

Hi, all, I build clang-tidy by "ninja clang-tidy", but when I run below command, I get no checks. Where is the clang-diagnostic* checkers? Thanks in advance. > $ /Users/zyg/Documents/workspace/llvm-project/llvm/cmake-build-debug/bin/clang-tidy --checks="-*,clang-diagnostic-*" --list-checks No checks enabled.

> First, is MPX hardware available now? I wouldn't mind getting my hands on > one. It is available at least in the mobile versions of the recent Intel Skylake CPUs. I am currently playing with Alienware 15 R2 with the following CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6820HK. Interestingly, my preliminary experiments indicate that adding MPX bounds checking via Pointer Checker in gcc is usually

Hello, This is updated version of nodatacow patch. To check whether a given file extent is referenced by multiple snapshots, the checker walks down the fs tree through dead root and checks all tree blocks in the path. We can easily detect whether a given tree block is directly referenced by other snapshot. We can also detect any indirect reference from other snapshot by checking

I've recently played with the GCC implementation of pointer checker on a real hardware, my recent impressions are here: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerIntelMemoryProtectionExtensions (there is also some old pre-hardware content). In short, I totally agree with what David says above: MPX is a disaster. (Usual disclaimer: my opinion here is too biased) I am glad

Hi R Helpers, I'm still new to R and i experience many difficulties..I'm using vegan package (R version 2.11) trying to calculate checkerboard units for each species pair of a matrix. I've prepared the function: pair.checker=function (dataset) {designdist (dataset, method="c("(A-J)x(B-J)", terms ="binary", abcd=FALSE)} to use with function oecosimu as

...ad not only to false negatives but to false positives as > well). But these false positives are relatively easy to suppress (eg., by > adding some sort of assert(x || !y), which is in most cases anyway a good > thing to document), and the primary benefit of this simplification is that > checkers no longer need to implement a "merge" function for the information > that they track in the program state: they only need to update their state > by modeling effect of every non-control-flow event in the program. With > ~100 checkers already written, limiting them to only simple...

Hi Ted, Doug said you might have a clang-based checker that would detect when people allocate memory with a BumpPtrAllocator and then construct a class into it that needs destruction. In killing valgrind-found memory leaks in LLVM, I've found several instances of this mistake. They often involve SmallVectors, which only show up as leaks in valgrind if they happen to overflow their static

Smatch complains that "rc" can be uninitialized if we hit the "break;" statement on the first iteration through the loop. I suspect that this can't happen in real life, but returning a zero literal is cleaner and silence the static checker warning. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

...ap to these ports via udev > rules, but not sure if we should change the name just to prepend 0s. > > Amit > The basic idea was to limit the space, having leading zeros is my idea because i found this more convenient in the past. Using something like "%3u" will give static checkers a chance to detect the required max. space. re, wh

...ap to these ports via udev > rules, but not sure if we should change the name just to prepend 0s. > > Amit > The basic idea was to limit the space, having leading zeros is my idea because i found this more convenient in the past. Using something like "%3u" will give static checkers a chance to detect the required max. space. re, wh

...ecker for dangling string pointer. I've learned some essential knowledge about compiler from our university course and built a mini-compiler on my own (Available at https://github.com/CHEN- Zhihan/Compiler). I've gone through the llvm tutorial and I am currently checking some of the static checkers and learning building a new checker. I am wondering if it is possible to treat this problem as a variation of use-after-free problem so that we may make some adaptations based on MallocChecker. I also think that we can check free the string from the raw pointer problem. This project is rather inte...