search for: checkconfig

...> 2012/12/01 10:40:49 eras Exp $ > > extra_started_commands="reload" > > depend() { > need localmount > before postfix > after bootmisc ldap mysql ntp-client ntpd postgresql saslauthd > slapd > use logger net > } > > checkconfig() { > DOVECOT_INSTANCE=${SVCNAME##*.} > if [ -n "${DOVECOT_INSTANCE}" -a "${SVCNAME}" != "dovecot" ]; then > DOVECOT_CONF=/etc/dovecot/dovecot.${DOVECOT_INSTANCE}.conf > else > DOVECOT_CONF=/etc/dovecot/dovecot.con...

Hi people! I am not getting really smart. I get the SVN Edition of asterisk GUI interface, compiled and love to get it to run, what won't work. What am I doing wrong?! svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk-gui/branches/2.0 make make checkconfig make install and If I open one of the URLs: http://localhost:8088/asterisk/static/config/cfgbasic.html http://127.0.0.1:8088/asterisk/static/config/cfgbasic.html I always get 404 not found! For any advises I would thank you. Here is the manager.conf and http.conf manager.conf: [general] disp...

Hi Gao, I checked the output of "lxc-checkconfig" command and it showed --- Namespaces --- Namespaces: enabled Utsname namespace: enabled Ipc namespace: enabled Pid namespace: enabled *User namespace: missing* Network namespace: enabled Multiple /dev/pts instances: enabled Here it shows that User namespace support is missing. I tried to ch...

Puppeteers, I''ve seen things in the documentation to make me think this is possible but I''m not sure how to implement it. Here''s what I''d like to do: puppetd pulls down a config file, say httpd.conf BEFORE puppetd moves it to $path, I''d like to have it check it''s integrity with apachectl configtest IF configtest passes, then puppetd should

Hello everyone, It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the reality could be different... I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and restart the master in the evening, but could do this sooner if you feel like this is urgent. Please let me know. Thanks Galina -----Original Messa...

...tanova at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. > Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. > Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the reality could be different... > I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and restart the master in the evening, but could do this sooner if you feel like this is urgent. Given the state of things I don't think anyone will...

...tanova at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. > Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. > Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the reality could be different... > I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and restart the master in the evening, but could do this sooner if you feel like this is urgent. Given the state of things I don't think anyone will...

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > All the LLVM lab FNT builders were reporting failures in the same set of > tests > (scimark2, LivermooreLoops, some others). Now they've all turned green but > the > same tests are still failing. I don't see any commits to deliberately make > the > FNT pass, so it looks like someone

...ek.com> wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. >> Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. >> Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the reality could be different... >> I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and restart the master in the evening, but could do this sooner if you feel like this is urgent. > > Given the state of things I don't thin...

...>>> >>> It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make >>> sure everything is all right on this end. >>> Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them >>> are broken. >>> Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the >>> reality could be different... >>> I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and restart the >>> master in the evening, but could do this sooner if you feel like this is urgent. >> >> Give...

Hi Gao, I appreciate your quick reply. >you can try create a file in container, and on host, the owner of this file is uid=1000. >and on the other side, if a file's owner is uid 1000 on host. in this container, you will >see the owner of this file is uid 0. I tried creating a file inside the container with root user. When I checked uid of the file on the host, it still gives me uid

...error: guest failed to start: Kernel doesn't support user namespace: If your configure file is right and the libvirt_lxc doesn't throw out error message, it's a bug we should fix. On 11/13/2013 01:24 PM, Saurabh Deochake wrote: > Hi Gao, > > I checked the output of "lxc-checkconfig" command and it showed > > --- Namespaces --- > Namespaces: enabled > Utsname namespace: enabled > Ipc namespace: enabled > Pid namespace: enabled > *User namespace: missing* > Network namespace: enabled > Multiple /dev/pts instances: enabled > > Here it sho...

Hello list, I have prepared a couple of new tutorials you may find interesting: - Installing an Asterisk 1.4 beta system - at http://astrecipes.net/?n=216 - Installing the Digium's Asterisk GUI for 1.4 - at http://astrecipes.net/?n=217 It's nothing too complex, but you may find them interesting, especially the new Asterisk GUI. Any comment is welcome - the site is a wiki, so feel

I have a Java program that I want to start up with every boot, but I'm unsure how to do it. There are two bootup scripts that start manually (script1.sh and script2.sh), and when the server gets shutdown, we have another script that we run (shutdownscript.sh) so that the DB does not get corrupted. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...gh about libvirtd to try and understand its behavior. Anyone got any clue about what's causing it to decide to exit? # libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.2 # uname -a Linux CI-Server-3-Backend-2 2.6.35.4-rscloud #2 SMP Sat Oct 29 21:16:49 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # lxc-checkconfig --- Namespaces --- Namespaces: enabled Utsname namespace: enabled Ipc namespace: enabled Pid namespace: enabled User namespace: enabled Network namespace: enabled Multiple /dev/pts instances: enabled --- Control groups --- Cgroup: enabled Cgroup namespace: enabled Cgroup device: enabled Cgroup sch...

Good day, Please, How/where can I add an application to start at boot up. Don't seem to find it in options available Thanks Johan

All the LLVM lab FNT builders were reporting failures in the same set of tests (scimark2, LivermooreLoops, some others). Now they've all turned green but the same tests are still failing. I don't see any commits to deliberately make the FNT pass, so it looks like someone broke failure detection... Note that the FNT "report" text became empty at the same time. Here's what