search for: check_legaci

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:18:25 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > So we should have a per-device callback into the transport layer, say > > check_legacy()? > > I would just have 2 masks: legacy_features and features. But these belong to the device type and the transport

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:18:25 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > So we should have a per-device callback into the transport layer, say > > check_legacy()? > > I would just have 2 masks: legacy_features and features. But these belong to the device type and the transport

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:42:11 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:31:39PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:22 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > Yet

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:42:11 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:31:39PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:22 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > Yet

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:28:42PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:18:25 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > So we should have a per-device callback into the transport layer, say > > > check_legacy()? > > > > I

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:28:42PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:18:25 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > So we should have a per-device callback into the transport layer, say > > > check_legacy()? > > > > I

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:28:42PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:18:25 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > So we should have a per-device callback into the transport layer, say > > > check_legacy()? > > > > I

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:28:42PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:18:25 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > So we should have a per-device callback into the transport layer, say > > > check_legacy()? > > > > I

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:42:11 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:31:39PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:22 +0200 > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > >

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:42:11 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:31:39PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:22 +0200 > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > >

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:22 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > Yet another version of the virtio-1 support patches. > > > > This one has seen some (very) light testing with the virtio-1 guest > > support patches currently on vhost-next. > > > > Changes

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:22 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > Yet another version of the virtio-1 support patches. > > > > This one has seen some (very) light testing with the virtio-1 guest > > support patches currently on vhost-next. > > > > Changes