search for: check_flags

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "check_flags".

Did you mean: check_gflags
2012 Dec 21
2
more compiler safety flags
Anyone see any reason not to add these extra compiler/linker flags if they're supported? Index: aclocal.m4 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/dtucker/openssh/cvs/openssh/aclocal.m4,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.8 aclocal.m4 --- aclocal.m4 20 May 2011 01:45:25 -0000 1.8 +++ aclocal.m4 17 Dec 2012 03:56:32 -0000 @@ -21,6 +21,23 @@
2013 Mar 22
1
additional compiler hardening flags
Hi all. Any reason not to turn these on if the system supports them? They're cheap but not free (a bit under 1% slower to run the complete regress suite in a completely unscientific test). They're based on info from these places: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/gnu-stack.xml and I've attempted to
2020 Mar 19
2
[PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
...2e/0x150 [ 138.091823] exit_mmap+0x24d/0x2a0 [ 138.095229] ? do_munmap+0x10/0x10 [ 138.098635] ? __x64_sys_io_setup+0x200/0x200 [ 138.102995] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xb4/0x3f0 [ 138.107704] ? wait_for_completion+0x250/0x250 [ 138.112158] ? lock_downgrade+0x380/0x380 [ 138.116176] ? check_flags.part.0+0x82/0x210 [ 138.120463] mmput+0xb5/0x210 [ 138.123444] do_exit+0x602/0x14c0 [ 138.126776] ? mm_update_next_owner+0x400/0x400 [ 138.131329] do_group_exit+0x8a/0x140 [ 138.135006] get_signal+0x25b/0x1080 [ 138.138606] do_signal+0x8c/0xa90 [ 138.141928] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2...
2020 Mar 17
4
[PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
On 3/17/20 5:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:47:55AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> I've been using v7 of Ralph's tester and it is working well - it has >> DEVICE_PRIVATE support so I think it can test this flow too. Ralph are >> you able? >> >> This hunk seems trivial enough to me, can we include it now? > > I can send