Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "check_flag".
Did you mean:
check_flac
2012 Dec 21
2
more compiler safety flags
...=====
RCS file: /home/dtucker/openssh/cvs/openssh/aclocal.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.8 aclocal.m4
--- aclocal.m4 20 May 2011 01:45:25 -0000 1.8
+++ aclocal.m4 17 Dec 2012 03:56:32 -0000
@@ -21,6 +21,23 @@ AC_DEFUN([OSSH_CHECK_CFLAG_COMPILE], [{
)
}])
+dnl OSSH_CHECK_CFLAG_LINK(check_flag[, define_flag])
+dnl Check that $LD accepts a flag 'check_flag'. If it is supported append
+dnl 'define_flag' to $LDFLAGS. If 'define_flag' is not specified, then append
+dnl 'check_flag'.
+AC_DEFUN([OSSH_CHECK_LDFLAG_LINK], [{
+ AC_MSG_CHECKING([if $LD supports $1])...
2013 Mar 22
1
additional compiler hardening flags
...=====
RCS file: /home/dtucker/openssh/cvs/openssh/aclocal.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.8 aclocal.m4
--- aclocal.m4 20 May 2011 01:45:25 -0000 1.8
+++ aclocal.m4 22 Mar 2013 02:42:20 -0000
@@ -21,6 +21,23 @@ AC_DEFUN([OSSH_CHECK_CFLAG_COMPILE], [{
)
}])
+dnl OSSH_CHECK_CFLAG_LINK(check_flag[, define_flag])
+dnl Check that $LD accepts a flag 'check_flag'. If it is supported append
+dnl 'define_flag' to $LDFLAGS. If 'define_flag' is not specified, then append
+dnl 'check_flag'.
+AC_DEFUN([OSSH_CHECK_LDFLAG_LINK], [{
+ AC_MSG_CHECKING([if $LD supports $1])...
2020 Mar 19
2
[PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
...2e/0x150
[ 138.091823] exit_mmap+0x24d/0x2a0
[ 138.095229] ? do_munmap+0x10/0x10
[ 138.098635] ? __x64_sys_io_setup+0x200/0x200
[ 138.102995] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xb4/0x3f0
[ 138.107704] ? wait_for_completion+0x250/0x250
[ 138.112158] ? lock_downgrade+0x380/0x380
[ 138.116176] ? check_flags.part.0+0x82/0x210
[ 138.120463] mmput+0xb5/0x210
[ 138.123444] do_exit+0x602/0x14c0
[ 138.126776] ? mm_update_next_owner+0x400/0x400
[ 138.131329] do_group_exit+0x8a/0x140
[ 138.135006] get_signal+0x25b/0x1080
[ 138.138606] do_signal+0x8c/0xa90
[ 138.141928] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x...
2020 Mar 17
4
[PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
On 3/17/20 5:59 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:47:55AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> I've been using v7 of Ralph's tester and it is working well - it has
>> DEVICE_PRIVATE support so I think it can test this flow too. Ralph are
>> you able?
>>
>> This hunk seems trivial enough to me, can we include it now?
>
> I can send