Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "chc_03".
Did you mean:
ch8_3
2007 May 28
1
[LLVMdev] Usage of llvmc
Hello, guys.
I've tried to use llvmc to test optimization options but wasn't successful.
Would you mind telling me what's wrong with this?
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ llvmc chc_03.c -O3 -o chc_03
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::string'
llvmc((anonymous namespace)::PrintStackTrace()+0x15)[0x8086091]
/lib/tls/libc.so.6(abort+0xe9)[0x367199]
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6(__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler()+0xeb)[0x74e25b]
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6[0x74...
2007 May 28
1
[LLVMdev] Usage of llvmc
...;t successful.
>> Would you mind telling me what's wrong with this?
>
>Hi, llvmc is experimental and isn't really supported. I'd suggest using
>llvm-gcc instead.
>
>-Chris
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> $ llvmc chc_03.c -O3 -o chc_03
>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::string'
>> llvmc((anonymous namespace)::PrintStackTrace()+0x15)[0x8086091]
>> /lib/tls/libc.so.6(abort+0xe9)[0x367199]
>> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6(__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler()+0xeb)[0x...
2007 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] Usage of llvmc (Sorry. Please disregard the right above.)
...;t successful.
>> Would you mind telling me what's wrong with this?
>
>Hi, llvmc is experimental and isn't really supported. I'd suggest using
>llvm-gcc instead.
>
>-Chris
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> $ llvmc chc_03.c -O3 -o chc_03
>> terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::string'
>> llvmc((anonymous namespace)::PrintStackTrace()+0x15)[0x8086091]
>> /lib/tls/libc.so.6(abort+0xe9)[0x367199]
>> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6(__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler()+0xeb)[0x...