Displaying 20 results from an estimated 21 matches for "channel_subsystem_release".
2019 Jun 03
2
[PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
...return sch;
> >>
> >> err:
> >> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
> >> dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
> >> css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
> >> css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
> >
> > ...and 64 bit here.
>
> and here.
/*
* We currently allocate notifier bits with this (using css->device
* as the device argument with the DMA API), and are fine with 64 bit
* addresses.
*/
Regards,
Halil
2019 Jun 03
2
[PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
...return sch;
> >>
> >> err:
> >> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
> >> dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
> >> css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
> >> css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
> >
> > ...and 64 bit here.
>
> and here.
/*
* We currently allocate notifier bits with this (using css->device
* as the device argument with the DMA API), and are fine with 64 bit
* addresses.
*/
Regards,
Halil
2019 Jun 03
5
[PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
...gt;dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> return sch;
>
> err:
> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
> dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
> css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
> css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
...and 64 bit here.
> + css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
> + css->device.dma_mask = &css->device.coherent_dma_mask;
>
> mutex_init(&css->mutex);
> css->cssid = chsc_get_cssid(nr);
(...)
> @@ -1059,16 +1168,19 @@ static int __init...
2019 Jun 03
5
[PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
...gt;dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> return sch;
>
> err:
> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
> dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
> css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
> css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
...and 64 bit here.
> + css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
> + css->device.dma_mask = &css->device.coherent_dma_mask;
>
> mutex_init(&css->mutex);
> css->cssid = chsc_get_cssid(nr);
(...)
> @@ -1059,16 +1168,19 @@ static int __init...
2019 Jun 03
0
[PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
...t;
> > >> err:
> > >> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
> > >> dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
> > >> css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
> > >> css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
> > >
> > > ...and 64 bit here.
> >
> > and here.
>
> /*
> * We currently allocate notifier bits with this (using css->device
> * as the device argument with the DMA API), and are fine with 64 bit
> * addresses.
> */
Thanks, that...
2019 Jun 03
0
[PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
....coherent_dma_mask;
>> return sch;
>>
>> err:
>> @@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
>> dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
>> css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
>> css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
>
> ...and 64 bit here.
and here.
>
>> + css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
>> + css->device.dma_mask = &css->device.coherent_dma_mask;
>>
>> mutex_init(&css->mutex);
>> css->cssid = chsc_get_cssid(nr);
>...
2019 Apr 09
0
[RFC PATCH 04/12] s390/cio: introduce cio DMA pool
...+
> static int __init setup_css(int nr)
> {
> struct channel_subsystem *css;
> @@ -899,6 +903,9 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
> dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
> css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
> css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
> + /* some cio DMA memory needs to be 31 bit addressable */
> + css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31),
> + css->device.dma_mask = &css_dev_dma_mask;
Question: Does this percolate down to the child devices eventually?
E.g., you have a ccw_device getting the mask from...
2019 May 23
0
[PATCH v2 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
...ma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31);
+ sch->dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
return sch;
err:
@@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
+ css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
+ css->device.dma_mask = &css->device.coherent_dma_mask;
mutex_init(&css->mutex);
css->cssid = chsc_get_cssid(nr);
@@ -1018,6 +1024,109 @@ static struct notifier_block css_power_notifier = {
.notifier_call = css_pow...
2019 Apr 09
0
[RFC PATCH 04/12] s390/cio: introduce cio DMA pool
...{
> > > struct channel_subsystem *css;
> > > @@ -899,6 +903,9 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
> > > dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
> > > css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
> > > css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
> > > + /* some cio DMA memory needs to be 31 bit addressable */
> > > + css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31),
> > > + css->device.dma_mask = &css_dev_dma_mask;
> >
> > Question: Does this percolate down to the child devices eventuall...
2019 Apr 26
0
[PATCH 05/10] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
...ev.dma_mask = &sch->dma_mask;
+ sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask = sch->dma_mask;
return sch;
err:
@@ -899,6 +906,9 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
+ /* some cio DMA memory needs to be 31 bit addressable */
+ css->device.coherent_dma_mask = css_dev_dma_mask,
+ css->device.dma_mask = &css_dev_dma_mask;
mutex_init(&css->mutex);
css->cssid = chsc_get_cssid(nr);
@@ -1018,6 +1028,96 @@ static struct notifier_block css_pow...
2019 May 29
0
[PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
...ma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31);
+ sch->dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
return sch;
err:
@@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
+ css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
+ css->device.dma_mask = &css->device.coherent_dma_mask;
mutex_init(&css->mutex);
css->cssid = chsc_get_cssid(nr);
@@ -1018,6 +1024,109 @@ static struct notifier_block css_power_notifier = {
.notifier_call = css_pow...
2019 Jun 06
0
[PATCH v4 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
...a_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31);
+ sch->dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
return sch;
err:
@@ -899,6 +907,13 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
+ /*
+ * We currently allocate notifier bits with this (using
+ * css->device as the device argument with the DMA API)
+ * and are fine with 64 bit addresses.
+ */
+ css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
+ css->device.dma_mask = &css->device.coherent_dma_mask;
m...
2019 Jun 12
0
[PATCH v5 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
...a_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31);
+ sch->dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
return sch;
err:
@@ -899,6 +907,13 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr)
dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr);
css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups;
css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;
+ /*
+ * We currently allocate notifier bits with this (using
+ * css->device as the device argument with the DMA API)
+ * and are fine with 64 bit addresses.
+ */
+ css->device.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
+ css->device.dma_mask = &css->device.coherent_dma_mask;
m...
2019 May 29
16
[PATCH v3 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 Jun 12
21
[PATCH v5 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 Jun 12
21
[PATCH v5 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 Jun 06
15
[PATCH v4 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 Jun 06
15
[PATCH v4 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 May 23
18
[PATCH v2 0/8] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV
2019 Apr 26
33
[PATCH 00/10] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization
Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of
bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio
core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly.
Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the
terminology used.
* Protected Virtualization (PV):
Protected Virtualization guarantees, that non-shared memory of a guest
that operates in PV