search for: changenames

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:52:47 -0400 Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu at oracle.com> wrote: > > + if (unlikely(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) { > + struct netdev_notifier_change_info change_info = { > + .info.dev = dev, > + }; > + > + call_netdevice_notifiers_info(NETDEV_CHANGE, > + &change_info.info); > + } This notifier is not really necessary, there

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:52:47 -0400 Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu at oracle.com> wrote: > > + if (unlikely(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) { > + struct netdev_notifier_change_info change_info = { > + .info.dev = dev, > + }; > + > + call_netdevice_notifiers_info(NETDEV_CHANGE, > + &change_info.info); > + } This notifier is not really necessary, there

Hi All, Server: Fedora 26 samba-4.6.8-0.fc26.x86_64 Workstations (5 of them): XP Pro SP3 I set all five of my customer XP workstations to Send NTLMv2 response only\\refuse LM and NTLM and turned off (smb.conf) lanman auth = yes ntlm auth = yes And had to turn it right back on as the customer's Xerox Workcentre 3550 multifunction printer scanner requires it What are

> On 10/02/17 17:16, ToddAndMargo via samba wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Server: >>    Fedora 26 >>    samba-4.6.8-0.fc26.x86_64 >> >> Workstations (5 of them): >>    XP Pro SP3 >> >> >> I set all five of my customer XP workstations to >> >> Send NTLMv2 response only\\refuse LM and NTLM >> >> and turned off

I'm trying to rename the columns in a list of data.frames using the following... for(i in 1:length(filenames)) { assign(names(get(filenames[i])), c("name", "infood", "time") ) } R returns no errors, but the names are unchanged in the data.frames. The original names were things like > names(get(filenames[2])) [1] "Tc45w4.V1" "Tc45w4.V2"

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 02:47:01PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 00:52:47 -0400 > Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu at oracle.com> wrote: > > > > > + if (unlikely(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) { > > + struct netdev_notifier_change_info change_info = { > > + .info.dev = dev, > > + }; > > + > > +

lanman should always be disabled.  use "testparm -v" to make sure the settings are applied as you expect.  With different samba versions, the defaults may change. I don't think you can disable ntlmv1 but leave ntlmv2 enabled.  I could be wrong.          NTLMv2 is stronger.     And I think clients will negotiate the strongest common protocol.      If you are in a small network

How old is the scanner ?   Did you check for a firmware update for it?    NTLM has been around for so long that it is hard to imagine anything that has to have LANMAN support. On 10/02/17 19:08, ToddAndMargo via samba wrote: >> On 10/02/17 17:16, ToddAndMargo via samba wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Server: >>>    Fedora 26 >>>