search for: change_notify_timeout

...samba.org/source/param/loadparm.c Fri May 3 03:03:25 2002 +++ samba-2.2.4/source/param/loadparm.c Thu Jun 6 16:49:53 2002 @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ int client_code_page; int announce_as; /* This is initialised in init_globals */ int machine_password_timeout; + int user_password_expiration; int change_notify_timeout; int stat_cache_size; int map_to_guest; @@ -953,6 +954,8 @@ #endif /* USING_GROUPNAME_MAP */ {"machine password timeout", P_INTEGER, P_GLOBAL, &Globals.machine_password_timeout, NULL, NULL, 0}, + + {"user password expiration", P_INTEGER, P_GLOBAL, &Globals.u...

...[2006/09/18 15:42:38, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(488) size=35 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=109 smb_reh=0 smb_err=49152 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=51201 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=102 smb_mid=1920 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 [2006/09/18 15:42:38, 10] smbd/process.c:setup_select_timeout(1284) change_notify_timeout: -1 [2006/09/18 15:43:38, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(241) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2006/09/18 15:43:38, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(448) NT user token: (NULL) [2006/09/18 15:43:38, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(474) UNIX token of user 0 Prim...

I have just been upgrading my Samba servers from 1.9.18p10 to 2.0.6 So far as I can tell users have been happy (or at least not noticed!). Our clients are almost exclusively NT 4.0 (most at SP5). Our servers are Suns running Solaris 2.5.1 and 7. On upgrading 2 of our busier servers (for admin - home directories and NT binaries), I observed a considerable increase in server load. Home server

..._file_list_changed(2998) lp_file_list_changed() file /usr/lib/smb.conf -> /usr/lib/smb.conf last mod_time: Thu Mar 8 18:33:11 2007 [2007/03/09 09:48:29, 5] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(543) init msg_type=0x81 msg_flags=0x0 [2007/03/09 09:48:29, 10] smbd/process.c:setup_select_timeout(1284) change_notify_timeout: 60 [2007/03/09 09:48:29, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(623) got smb length of 179 [2007/03/09 09:48:29, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1109) got message type 0x0 of len 0xb3 [2007/03/09 09:48:29, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1110) Transaction 1 of length 183 [2007/03/09...

...ist_changed(3006) lp_file_list_changed() file /etc/samba/smb.conf -> /etc/samba/smb.conf last mod_time: Tue Jan 30 15:34:48 2007 [2007/01/30 15:54:53, 5] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(543) init msg_type=0x81 msg_flags=0x0 [2007/01/30 15:54:53, 10] smbd/process.c:setup_select_timeout(1284) change_notify_timeout: -1 [2007/01/30 15:54:53, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(623) got smb length of 168 [2007/01/30 15:54:53, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1109) got message type 0x0 of len 0xa8 [2007/01/30 15:54:53, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1110) Transaction 1 of length 172 [2007/01/3...

...t takes 5-30 seconds to get a respond. It is very bad for the network, because a printer, connected to a linux PC, doesn't work through samba because of this. Here is a piece of logs with "debug level = 10". [2007/02/10 14:02:54, 10] smbd/process.c:setup_select_timeout(1284) change_notify_timeout: -1 [2007/02/10 14:02:59, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(623) got smb length of 39 I don't know what is it doing for those 5 seconds between the two records. I need your help badly. Looking forward to hearing from you. With best regards, Artem

...= /sbin/nologin winbind use default domain = Yes [jobs] path = /jobs valid users = "@DOMAIN.COM\\Jobs Users" read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 inherit acls = Yes Here's a debug level 10 snippet from smbd: change_notify_timeout: -1 read_data: read of 4 returned 0. Error = Success receive_smb_raw: length < 0! timeout_processing: End of file from client (client has disconnected). Closing cache file namecache_shutdown: netbios namecache closed successfully. setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 NT user token: (NU...

...[2008/11/11 09:07:20, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(495) size=35 smb_com=0x75 smb_rcls=102 smb_reh=0 smb_err=49152 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=51201 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=256 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 [2008/11/11 09:07:20, 10] smbd/process.c:setup_select_timeout(1285) change_notify_timeout: -1

I have upgrade the pdc server from debian sarge to etch. After this operation we can't login to the domain (client windows 2000 & XP) smbclient works fine and from a windows local account I can browser the samba directories too (puttin username and password before..) I use tdbsam of course and pdbedit -L let me see all the accounts, it seems to work fine I tried to remove a pc from

...[1D0] 89 33 8D 71 5E D8 C2 30 CF 54 C6 64 37 34 9A 79 .3.q^..0 .T.d74.y [1E0] D7 0B 63 F2 B9 66 5B 27 11 DF 7E 2C B3 1D 8A AB ..c..f[' ..~,.... [1F0] 94 2A 8F 9C 41 D2 60 A5 59 F4 F1 64 7B 0C 7B 6F .*..A.`. Y..d{.{o [2008/04/30 15:26:50, 10] smbd/process.c:setup_select_timeout(1372) change_notify_timeout: -1 [2008/04/30 15:26:50, 10] smbd/process.c:run_events(299) run_events: No events my smb.conf [global] workgroup = MAILAN.LOCAL netbios name = AUTHLAN server string = Samba-LDAP PDC Server passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://127.0.0.1/ log level = 3 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m smb por...

...500) [2006/07/24 14:24:59, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(510) size=35 smb_com=0x75 smb_rcls=34 smb_reh=0 smb_err=49152 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=49153 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=3145 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=6 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 [2006/07/24 14:24:59, 10] smbd/process.c:setup_select_timeout(1284) change_notify_timeout: -1 [2006/07/24 14:25:00, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(525) read_data: read of 4 returned 0. Error = Success [2006/07/24 14:25:00, 10] lib/util_sock.c:receive_smb_raw(672) receive_smb_raw: length < 0! [2006/07/24 14:25:00, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1359) timeout_processing: End...

...t;member of the group with id 60000 (see above) > >I post almost a full log here. Some parts which might contain my >password is removed. I hope I did not forget anything. > > >Mario > > >[2006/08/27 20:02:52, 10, pid=18112] smbd/process.c:setup_select_timeout(1284) > change_notify_timeout: -1 >[2006/08/27 20:03:02, 3, pid=4545] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(241) > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 >[2006/08/27 20:03:02, 5, pid=4545] auth/auth_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(448) > NT user token: (NULL) >[2006/08/27 20:03:02, 5, pid=4545] auth/auth_util.c:debug_...

...id 60000 is assigned to me? Why? I am not member of the group with id 60000 (see above) I post almost a full log here. Some parts which might contain my password is removed. I hope I did not forget anything. Mario [2006/08/27 20:02:52, 10, pid=18112] smbd/process.c:setup_select_timeout(1284) change_notify_timeout: -1 [2006/08/27 20:03:02, 3, pid=4545] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(241) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2006/08/27 20:03:02, 5, pid=4545] auth/auth_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(448) NT user token: (NULL) [2006/08/27 20:03:02, 5, pid=4545] auth/auth_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(474)...

...C7 ...)i... ...n.m.. [1F0] 01 00 EB 29 69 88 FE C6 01 00 EB 29 69 88 FE C6 ...)i... ...)i... [2007/01/10 10:58:42, 4] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2findfirst(1864) SMBtrans2 mask=* directory=tmp/scarter dirtype=22 numentries=24 [2007/01/10 10:58:42, 10] smbd/process.c:setup_select_timeout(1284) change_notify_timeout: -1 [2007/01/10 10:59:42, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(241) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2007/01/10 10:59:42, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(448) NT user token: (NULL)

Hi, I've used Samba several years without any problems. Last week I added a new disk to my system, and Samba started to behave very strange. It's slow in terms of establish a connection and time to list directories. I've tried to resolve the problem without success. No other daemon has problems, both ftp and http works fine as well as internal communication. Below I've attached

Hello list! On all my samba installations (3.0.20b) I can delete all unused printer drivers with rpcclient regardless which user name or password i use. Is this a general feature or might it depend on my settings? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Zielinski mz@seh.de Software Development SEH Computertechnik GmbH www.seh.de