search for: challengeresponseauthent

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "challengeresponseauthent".

2015 Jul 30
2
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Jul 29, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >>> Security is *always* opposed to convenience. >> >> False. OS X by default runs only signed
2015 Jul 30
0
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On 07/30/2015 12:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > No fail2ban, no firewall rules, sshd by default, challengeresponseauth > by default, ChallengeResponseAuth is not on by default, on Red Hat derived systems. I'm pretty sure that was already clarified, much earlier in this thread. > and a 9 character (even random) passphrase, and that shit > is going to get busted into. Against a
2015 Jul 28
1
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > That?s only true if the majority of people will in fact override the default policy. The current behavior in Fedora and CentOS lets you click Done twice and bypass the weak password complaint. > But as I have repeatedly pointed out here, the stock rules really are not that onerous. They basically encode
2015 Jul 30
1
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On 07/29/2015 07:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > >> Security is *always* opposed to convenience. > False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come > from the App Store they run in a sandbox. User gains significant > security with this, and are completely unaware of it. There is
2015 Jul 28
11
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: > Much of the evil on the Internet today ? DDoS armies, spam spewers, phishing botnets ? is done on pnwed hardware, much of which was compromised by previous botnets banging on weak SSH passwords. Since most of that crap comes from Windows hosts, the security of Linux SSH passwords seems hardly relevant. > Your freedom to use
2015 Jul 29
4
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > Security is *always* opposed to convenience. False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come from the App Store they run in a sandbox. User gains significant security with this, and are completely unaware of it. There is no inconvenience. What is the inconvenience of encrypting your device