search for: chaining

libswfdec/swfdec_as_function.c | 9 test/trace/Makefile.am | 117 ++++++++++ test/trace/scope-chain-did-you-understand-5.swf |binary test/trace/scope-chain-did-you-understand-5.swf.trace | 1 test/trace/scope-chain-did-you-understand-6.swf |binary

Hello! I am performing coupling of chains in MCMC and I need the same value of seed for two chains. I will show demo of what I want: R code, which might show my example is: niter <- 3 nchain <- 2 tmpSeed <- 123 for (i in 1:niter) { # iterations for (j in 1:nchain) { # chains set.seed(tmpSeed) a <- runif(1) cat("iter:", i, "chain:", j,

This is a set of few chain post-merge patches - mostly revolving around simple adjustments, though a few are somewhat larger and/or introducing new features (nothing particularly complex though). Fetch details at the bottom. I didn't spam the list with mass of mostly banal patches, though of course I can send them any moment if necessary. Summary of a few more important ones: -

chain.c32 of SYSLINUX 3.82 does set the boot drive passed to the DL register to 0x80 and not to the boot drive (CD-drive). This can be a problem if you want to chainload grldr (grub4dos bootloader) from a CD and if you want to let grldr search for its menu.lst file on the CD. For more info: http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=8457 This 1 line patch fixes the issue (Thanks to

Hi, An issue that's been cropping up recently is chaining support. We discussed this a bit at FOMS 2008, and there are some open issues. There was talk of making some skeleton-like metadata that spans chain boundaries (or perhaps putting into skeleton a "chain identifier"). Other things that need to be specced out: * edits vs. playlists: how t...

On 07/14/16 05:56, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > @Peter, Erwan, Gene, Michal, (and anyone else interested)... > > Although I haven't actually tested Erwan's patch, would it be > acceptable by you (all) if I were to send a patch to this Syslinux > Mailing List with the same code while changing the wording as I > previously suggested in a prior email? Would it be

This is a bit updated set of chain.c32 changes that simplifies a few things (and in partiter part), fixes few minor issues and adds a few new features. Details are in the following commits, below is the summary and pull details at the end. Shao - any chance to peek over them ? Most of those are relatively simple changes and well tested, though of course something might have slipped my attention.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1305 Bug ID: 1305 Summary: Rules in second chain same hook ignored if first chain has policy drop Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

newbee here. What's the difference between glue and chain? Why can't we add chains to any node we want? On Fri, Jul 17, 2020, 10:25 PM Björn Pettersson A via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Still sounds to me as Glue might help (as already proposed by Craig), but > maybe I’ve misunderstood something. > > > > Another option is to do a simple

This small set fixes few bugs, improves gpt handling (under buggy conditions) and implements strict flag with more fine grained control which should fix issues with sanity checks against disk sizes. If this set is allright I'd want to do what I mentioned in older discussion with Ady - backport missing patches from 6.x to 5.x and 4.x so all versions have up to date chain version. Michal

I did it by code preparing into an intrinsic that has side effects. Pseudo instruction would work as well. I'm not sure if glue would help, since the nodes A->B, C->D from example above are not necessarily adjacent. More hooks into the selection DAG builder may be an idea for a LLVM extension. For example in this case, custom allowing for a node to be built with an existing chain would

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Bug ID: 1295 Summary: Access decision from previous priority Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

Hello all. Here[1] is a branch where chain.c32 can chain-boot a partition on a GPT disk when given the partition index. boot: chain hd1 84 (For example.) - Shao Miller [1] http://git.zytor.com/?p=users/sha0/syslinux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ chain_gpt

Re: Do they really need to be chained with each other or anything else Yes. For 2 reasons. Our architecture lowers udivmem into something with 1 producer and 2 consumers. Reason 1) neither the producers nor the consumers must get reordered. Reason 2) one of the consumers might be missing (either the div or mod consumer might not be present. Yet we need to keep the consuming instruction with side

I need to lower a node into something in the machine that has side effects, i.e. needs a chain. Specifically it's actually UDIVREM. UDIVREM does not have a chain. I can custom lower UDIVREM into the nodes I want, with chain, I can even chain the new nodes and connect them to entry and root with token factors. But then the new nodes are not chained with respect to other nodes, or not chained

Hi, I'm quite puzzled by a little bit of code in the DAGCombiner where it merges loads in MergeConsecutiveStores. Two 16bit loads have been merged to one 32bit load, and two 16bit stores have been combined to one 32bit store. And then the code goes like this: // Replace one of the loads with the new load. LoadSDNode *Ld = cast<LoadSDNode>(LoadNodes[0].MemNode);

i`ve found a bug in chain.c32 in v4.06. When i use isolinux it does not run windows7 installation, chainloading bootmgr. the error is: Can't find myself on the drive I booted from. chain.c32 from syslinux 3.xx works like a charm! chain.c32 from syslinux 5 shous tat this is not a com32 app

We''re testing out the Puppetlabs-Firewall module. And it seems I''m either missing something fundamental or Logging/Accpet works/doesn''t work in an irregular way. I would be most grateful for some input. *COMMON:* firewall { ''002 accept related established rules INPUT'': proto => ''all'', state =>

Looking at the UEFI specs, and _if_ I understand Erwan's patch correctly, we are talking about searching for a "Partition Name". Avoiding the "label" term for this new option should help in reducing some potential confusions (e.g. BSD's "disklabel", fdisk's "partition label (type)", filesystem's "volume label"...). So, IMO,

Hello, We have a 3-node cluster setup with ocfs2. Since friday one of the nodes went down and would not become clustermember after a reboot because it was unable to write to the ocfs2 filesystem. Message: no space left on device. There is plenty of diskspace though. No problem whatsoever to create a file / directory on the filesystem using one of the other nodes. Today one of the remaining