search for: cgnode

...lGraphSCCPass { static char ID; myPass() : CallGraphSCCPass(ID) {} virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.setPreservesAll(); AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); } virtual bool runOnSCC(CallGraphSCC &SCC) { for (CallGraphSCC::iterator CGNodeItr = SCC.begin(), CFNodeItrE=SCC.end();CGNodeItr!=CGNodeItrE;++CGNodeItr) } const CallGraphNode *CGNode = *CGNodeItr; Function *F = CGNode->getFunction(); if (!F->isDeclaration()) LoopInfo &LI = getAnaly...

I would have thought this would have been possible. On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > So is this simply not possible? > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Nick, >> >> Thanks for this info, though this didn't help my problem at all. >> >>

...gt;   myPass() : CallGraphSCCPass(ID) {} >   virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { >            AU.setPreservesAll(); >            AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); >   } >   virtual bool runOnSCC(CallGraphSCC &SCC) { >        for (CallGraphSCC::iterator CGNodeItr = SCC.begin(), > CFNodeItrE=SCC.end();CGNodeItr!=CGNodeItrE;++CGNodeItr)  } >                   const CallGraphNode *CGNode = *CGNodeItr; >                   Function *F = CGNode->getFunction(); >                   if (!F->isDeclaration()) >                                Lo...

...D; >  myPass() : CallGraphSCCPass(ID) {} >  virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { >            AU.setPreservesAll(); >            AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); >  } >  virtual bool runOnSCC(CallGraphSCC &SCC) { >        for (CallGraphSCC::iterator CGNodeItr = SCC.begin(), CFNodeItrE=SCC.end();CGNodeItr!=CGNodeItrE;++CGNodeItr)  } >                  const CallGraphNode *CGNode = *CGNodeItr; >                  Function *F = CGNode->getFunction(); >                  if (!F->isDeclaration()) >                                LoopInfo...

...ion->BasicBlock->Instruction, is this not the case? virtual bool runOnSCC(CallGraphSCC &SCC) { errs() << "CDFGPass: " << "\n"; errs() <<"Size of SCC: "<<SCC.size()<<"\n"; for(CallGraphSCC::iterator CGNodeItr = SCC.begin(); CGNodeItr != SCC.end();++CGNodeItr) { errs()<<"Iterating CallNodeGraphs"<<"\n"; const CallGraphNode *CGNode = cast<CallGraphNode>(&*CGNodeItr); errs()<<"Getting Function&qu...

...ass(ID) {} > > virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > > AU.setPreservesAll(); > > AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); > > } > > virtual bool runOnSCC(CallGraphSCC &SCC) { > > for (CallGraphSCC::iterator CGNodeItr = SCC.begin(), > > CFNodeItrE=SCC.end();CGNodeItr!=CGNodeItrE;++CGNodeItr) } > > const CallGraphNode *CGNode = *CGNodeItr; > > Function *F = CGNode->getFunction(); > > if (!F->isDeclaration()) > >...

...CCPass(ID) {} > > virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > > AU.setPreservesAll(); > > AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); > > } > > virtual bool runOnSCC(CallGraphSCC &SCC) { > > for (CallGraphSCC::iterator CGNodeItr = SCC.begin(), > CFNodeItrE=SCC.end();CGNodeItr!=CGNodeItrE;++CGNodeItr) } > > const CallGraphNode *CGNode = *CGNodeItr; > > Function *F = CGNode->getFunction(); > > if (!F->isDeclaration()) > >...

...passMgr.add(this);* *}* * * *bool AnalysisDriver::run(Module &module) {* * passMgr.run(module);* *}* * * *bool AnalysisDriver::runOnSCC(CallGraphSCC &scc) {* * for (CallGraphSCC::iterator i = scc.begin(),* * e = scc.end(); i != e; ++i) {* * CallGraphNode *cgnode = *i;* * Function *f = cgnode->getFunction();* * if (f == NULL || f->isDeclaration())* * continue;* * * * runOnFunction(f);* * }* * return false;* *}* * * *bool AnalysisDriver::runOnFunction(Function *f) {* * AliasAnalysis &aa = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>(*f);* * ....

...ither have to wait for someone else to respond or just figure it out using trial and error. Third, are you including the header file that provides the definition of LoopInfo? If not, that could be a problem. -- John T. > > Here is the code I'm using: > > Function *F = CGNode->getFunction(); > errs()<<"#Get Loop Info\n"; > if (!(F->getDeclaration())) > LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(F); > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:13 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu > <mailto...

...g trial and error. >> >> Third, are you including the header file that provides the definition of >> LoopInfo? If not, that could be a problem. >> >> -- John T. >> >> >> >> Here is the code I'm using: >> >> Function *F = CGNode->getFunction(); >> errs()<<"#Get Loop Info\n"; >> if (!(F->getDeclaration())) >> LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(F); >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:13 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illin...

...e else to respond or just figure it out using trial and error. > > Third, are you including the header file that provides the definition of > LoopInfo? If not, that could be a problem. > > -- John T. > > > > Here is the code I'm using: > > Function *F = CGNode->getFunction(); > errs()<<"#Get Loop Info\n"; > if (!(F->getDeclaration())) > LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(F); > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:13 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > &...

LLVMers, I am doing a CallGraphPass but would like to get the LoopInfo of the functions inside this pass, is this possible? Currently I have a function inside the CallGraph struct: void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); AU.addPreserved<LoopInfo>(); } And later inside the pass I am calling: LoopInfo &LI =

...Third, are you including the header file that provides the definition of >>> LoopInfo? If not, that could be a problem. >>> >>> -- John T. >>> >>> >>> >>> Here is the code I'm using: >>> >>> Function *F = CGNode->getFunction(); >>> errs()<<"#Get Loop Info\n"; >>> if (!(F->getDeclaration())) >>> LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>(F); >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:13 AM, John Criswe...