search for: cgen

.../articles/article.aspx?p=1215438): "In > contrast, every time I look at the GCC code, it takes two people to > prevent me from clawing my eyeballs out." > > I'm sorry to report that so-far I have had the opposite experience. > Some years ago, I ported binutils (via CGEN) and GCC to an embedded > RISC CPU and found it the process straightforward and pleasant. > CGEN was especially handy for describing a sometimes quirky RISC > instruction set and offered great flexibility for factoring-out > commonalities. By contrast, I have found TableGen to...

...e http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438): "In contrast, every time I look at the GCC code, it takes two people to prevent me from clawing my eyeballs out." I'm sorry to report that so-far I have had the opposite experience. Some years ago, I ported binutils (via CGEN) and GCC to an embedded RISC CPU and found it the process straightforward and pleasant. CGEN was especially handy for describing a sometimes quirky RISC instruction set and offered great flexibility for factoring-out commonalities. By contrast, I have found TableGen to be much more rigid and...

...it (send-v2) respectively. Further this patch has the dependency on the following patches Liu Bo: [PATCH 2/3 RESEND] Btrfs-progs: show generation in command btrfs subvol list [PATCH 3/3] Btrfs-progs: list snapshots by generation Eg output: #btrfs su list -s 1 /btrfs ID 258 gen 39 cgen 6 top level 5 crtime 2012-07-27 17:43:55 path ss1 ID 260 gen 8 cgen 8 top level 5 crtime 2012-07-27 17:47:51 path ss2 ID 263 gen 16 cgen 16 top level 5 crtime 2012-07-29 00:50:19 path ss3 ID 264 gen 25 cgen 25 top level 5 crtime 2012-07-30 09:56:50 path sv1/.snap Anand Jain (1): Btrfs-p...

...es shall be printed. This is necessary because this commit also adds all the so far missing items from the root_item like the received UUID, all generation values and all time values. The parameters to the "--fields" option is a list of items to print: --fields=gen,dirid,uuid,puuid,ruuid,cgen,ogen,sgen,rgen,ctime,otime, stime,rtime,path,rootid,parent,topid,all Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> --- btrfs-list.c | 418 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- btrfs-list.h | 40 +++++- cmds-subvolume.c | 57 +++----- man/btrfs.8.in...

.../articles/article.aspx?p=1215438): "In > contrast, every time I look at the GCC code, it takes two people to > prevent me from clawing my eyeballs out." > > I'm sorry to report that so-far I have had the opposite experience. > Some years ago, I ported binutils (via CGEN) and GCC to an embedded > RISC CPU and found it the process straightforward and pleasant. > CGEN was especially handy for describing a sometimes quirky RISC > instruction set and offered great flexibility for factoring-out > commonalities. By contrast, I have found TableGen to...

.../articles/article.aspx?p=1215438): "In > contrast, every time I look at the GCC code, it takes two people to > prevent me from clawing my eyeballs out." > > I'm sorry to report that so-far I have had the opposite experience. > Some years ago, I ported binutils (via CGEN) and GCC to an embedded > RISC CPU and found it the process straightforward and pleasant. > CGEN was especially handy for describing a sometimes quirky RISC > instruction set and offered great flexibility for factoring-out > commonalities. By contrast, I have found TableGen to...

...sed on SID). I want to make it easier for software engineers to produce code for this architecture so I'm moving onto the next phase by attempting a C compiler, so here I am. First, I would rather not maintain two different descriptions of the assembly/ISA specification, one in binutils/SID (CGEN) and another in LLVM. I have found some posts about the LLVM MC project, that it can essentially produce an inline or standalone assembler, but is the MC project ready for prime-time? Should I invest my time going this route? It's hard to get a sense of what direction the project is moving i...