Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cgcleanup".
Did you mean:
cfgcleanup
2012 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] VMKit build broken
Hi,
I just thought of trying vmkit and checked out the source
from the svn repo a few minutes back. The build is failing with the
following error.
llvm[4]: Compiling CGCleanup.cpp for Release+Asserts build
CGCleanup.cpp:507:36: error: no member named 'getCaseSuccessor' in
'llvm::SwitchInst'; did you mean 'getSuccessor'?
llvm::BranchInst::Create(si->getCaseSuccessor(0), si);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~...
2012 May 22
0
[LLVMdev] VMKit build broken
...y 21, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Balachandran Sivakumar <
benignbala at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just thought of trying vmkit and checked out the source
> from the svn repo a few minutes back. The build is failing with the
> following error.
>
> llvm[4]: Compiling CGCleanup.cpp for Release+Asserts build
> CGCleanup.cpp:507:36: error: no member named 'getCaseSuccessor' in
> 'llvm::SwitchInst'; did you mean 'getSuccessor'?
> llvm::BranchInst::Create(si->getCaseSuccessor(0), si);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~...
2020 Apr 16
2
[RFC] [Windows SEH][-EHa] Support Hardware Exception Handling
As stated in the design paragraph, this design does not intend to model precise CFG at instruction level since it’s complicated and unnecessary.
As long as we comply C and C++ rules listed below, we achieve -EHa semantic. There is NO need to precisely model HW exception control flow at instruction-level.
Your example about memcpy() is just a bug in current implementation. I will fix it so that