Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "cfunc".
Did you mean:
func
2014 Mar 06
2
A question about multiple(?) out of order ReleaseObject
Hello,
This is a question that probably reveals my lack of understanding.
In a C function (call it cfunc), i created a SEXP, called S, and then
called R_PreserveObject on S.
I returned the SEXP to the calling R function (call it rfunc). Note, I
didn't call
R_ReleaseObject on S.
v <- .Call("cfunc")
So, are the following statements correct
1. S is 'doubly' protected from t...
2009 Jul 07
3
rake db:create:all error
Hi,
I am getting this error when i execute rake db:create:all
/opt/gitorious/vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/mysql_adapter.rb:569:
[BUG] unknown type 0x22 (0xc given)
any clues ?
-Manish
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2014 Mar 07
0
Repost: (apologies for HTML post) A question about multiple(?) out of order ReleaseObject
Apologies, I am resending this because my emails seem to go in HTML form.
Hello,
This is a question that probably reveals my lack of understanding.
In a C function (call it cfunc), i created a SEXP, called S, and then
called R_PreserveObject on S.
I returned the SEXP to the calling R function (call it rfunc). Note, I
didn't call
R_ReleaseObject on S.
v <- .Call("cfunc")
So, are the following statements correct
1. S is 'doubly' protected from t...
2014 Mar 07
0
Many apologies: last post: A question about multiple(?) out of order ReleaseObject
Apologies, I am resending this because my emails seem to go in HTML form.
(I haven't as yet figured gmail web interface)
Hello,
This is a question that probably reveals my lack of understanding.
In a C function (call it cfunc), i created a SEXP, called S, and then
called R_PreserveObject on S.
I returned the SEXP to the calling R function (call it rfunc). Note, I
didn't call
R_ReleaseObject on S.
v <- .Call("cfunc")
So, are the following statements correct
1. S is 'doubly' protected from t...
2020 Aug 24
0
[PATCH v6 48/76] x86/entry/64: Add entry code for #VC handler
.../* pt_regs->ss */
pushq PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_tss_rw + TSS_sp2) /* pt_regs->sp */
@@ -446,6 +448,82 @@ _ASM_NOKPROBE(\asmsym)
SYM_CODE_END(\asmsym)
.endm
+/**
+ * idtentry_vc - Macro to generate entry stub for #VC
+ * @vector: Vector number
+ * @asmsym: ASM symbol for the entry point
+ * @cfunc: C function to be called
+ *
+ * The macro emits code to set up the kernel context for #VC. The #VC handler
+ * runs on an IST stack and needs to be able to cause nested #VC exceptions.
+ *
+ * To make this work the #VC entry code tries its best to pretend it doesn't use
+ * an IST stack by sw...
2008 May 24
0
[ wxruby-Bugs-20346 ] can not run wxruby-1.9.7 under ruby1.9.0 in linux
.../lib/ruby1.9/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.0/gems/wxruby-1.9.7-x86-linux/lib/wxruby2.so: [BUG] unknown type 0x22 (0x12 given)
ruby 1.9.0 (2007-12-25 revision 14709) [i686-linux]
-- control frame ----------
c:0008 p:-34008570 s:0021 b:0021 l:000020 d:000020 TOP
c:0007 p:---- s:0019 b:0019 l:000018 d:000018 CFUNC :require
c:0006 p:0009 s:0015 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 TOP /usr/lib/ruby1.9/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.0/gems/wxruby-1.9.7-x86-linux/lib/wx.rb:12
c:0005 p:---- s:0012 b:0012 l:000011 d:000011 FINISH :class_eval
c:0004 p:---- s:0010 b:0010 l:000009 d:000009 CFUNC :require
c:0003 p:0020 s:0006 b:0006 l:0...
2009 Oct 25
2
wxruby2.so: [BUG] Segmentation fault on require 'wx'
.../Applications/Ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/wxruby-2.0.1-x86-mswin32-60/lib/wxruby2.so:
[BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.1p129 (2009-05-12 revision 23412) [i386-mswin32]
-- control frame ----------
c:0008 p:-9088168 s:0021 b:0021 l:000020 d:000020 TOP
c:0007 p:---- s:0019 b:0019 l:000018 d:000018 CFUNC :require
c:0006 p:0011 s:0015 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 TOP C:/Program
Files/Applications/Ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/wxruby-2.0.1-x86-mswin32-60/lib/wx.rb:12
c:0005 p:---- s:0012 b:0012 l:000011 d:000011 FINISH
c:0004 p:---- s:0010 b:0010 l:000009 d:000009 CFUNC :require
c:0003 p:0038 s:0006...
2012 Aug 18
0
hosting with speedyrails
...p180 (2011-02-18 revision 30909)
[x86_64-linux]
*** [err :: myserver]
*** [err :: myserver] -- control frame ----------
*** [err :: myserver] c:0120
*** [err :: myserver] p:----
*** [err :: myserver] s:0469 b:0469
*** [err :: myserver] l:000468
*** [err :: myserver] d:000468
*** [err :: myserver] CFUNC
*** [err :: myserver] :New
*** [err :: myserver]
.
.
.
.
.
.
*** [err :: myserver]
/var/www/apps/app-name/shared/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/gems/therubyracer-0.9.4/lib/v8/portal.rb:50:in
`v8''
*** [err :: myserver]
/var/www/apps/app-name/shared/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/gems/therubyracer-0.9.4/lib/v8/po...
2020 Aug 31
1
[PATCH v6 48/76] x86/entry/64: Add entry code for #VC handler
..., Joerg Roedel wrote:
> @@ -446,6 +448,82 @@ _ASM_NOKPROBE(\asmsym)
> SYM_CODE_END(\asmsym)
> .endm
>
ifdeffery pls...
> +/**
> + * idtentry_vc - Macro to generate entry stub for #VC
> + * @vector: Vector number
> + * @asmsym: ASM symbol for the entry point
> + * @cfunc: C function to be called
> + *
> + * The macro emits code to set up the kernel context for #VC. The #VC handler
> + * runs on an IST stack and needs to be able to cause nested #VC exceptions.
> + *
> + * To make this work the #VC entry code tries its best to pretend it doesn't u...
2010 Apr 13
2
Getting started with .C
Jeff Brown wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to learn to use .C, which lets one invoke compiled C code from
> within R. To do that, one has to first get the C code into R as a shared
> object, which (I think) means first compiling it (with COMPILE or SHLIB)
> and then loading it (with dyn.load()).
>
I would suggest taking it a step further and building an R package
2020 Aug 24
96
[PATCH v6 00/76] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is the new version of the SEV-ES client enabling patch-set. It is
based on the latest tip/master branch and contains the necessary
changes. In particular those ar:
- Enabling CR4.FSGSBASE early on supported processors so that
early #VC exceptions on APs can be handled.
- Add another patch (patch 1) to fix a KVM frame-size build
2020 Jul 24
86
[PATCH v5 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is a rebased version of the latest SEV-ES patches. They are now
based on latest tip/master instead of upstream Linux and include the
necessary changes.
Changes to v4 are in particular:
- Moved early IDT setup code to idt.c, because the idt_descr
and the idt_table are now static
- This required to make stack protector work early (or
2020 Jul 14
92
[PATCH v4 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I
addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and
rebased the code v5.8-rc5.
The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the
#VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big
pile of entry code changes merged into
2020 Jul 14
92
[PATCH v4 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is the fourth version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches. I
addressed the review comments sent to me for the previous version and
rebased the code v5.8-rc5.
The biggest change in this version is the IST handling code for the
#VC handler. I adapted the entry code for the #VC handler to the big
pile of entry code changes merged into
2020 Sep 07
84
[PATCH v7 00/72] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The
previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the
discussions around it.
Another important change is that the early IDT
2020 Sep 07
84
[PATCH v7 00/72] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
Hi,
here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The
previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the
discussions around it.
Another important change is that the early IDT