Displaying 20 results from an estimated 34 matches for "cfrac".
Did you mean:
frac
2007 May 09
1
[LLVMdev] Patch for LLVM 2.0 release branch
This one needs to go into the 2.0 branch:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-
Mon-20070507/049464.html
This is required to fix a bug I introduced that breaks 177.mesa,
distray, and cfrac on ARM.
Evan
2011 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...ce/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.compile 7.21% 1.1218 1.2027 0.0173
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo.compile 6.93% 0.8243 0.8814 0.0106
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell.compile 6.48% 1.7091
> 1.8199 0.0047
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.compile 6.45% 1.0109 1.0761 0.0116
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.compile 6.44% 6.6061 7.0314
> 0.0251
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame.compile 6.34% 4.5856
> 4.8764 0.0186
> MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd.compile 6.34% 1.7050...
2011 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...rsaBench/dbms/dbms.compile 7.21% 1.1218 1.2027 0.0173
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo.compile 6.93% 0.8243 0.8814 0.0106
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell.compile 6.48% 1.7091
>> 1.8199 0.0047
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.compile 6.45% 1.0109 1.0761 0.0116
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.compile 6.44% 6.6061 7.0314
>> 0.0251
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame.compile 6.34% 4.5856
>> 4.8764 0.0186
>> MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd....
2009 Apr 24
0
[LLVMdev] CIL 1.3.7 release, with experimental LLVM code generation
...eb page, at
http://berkeley.intel-research.net/dgay/cil-llvm-tests.tar.gz
You can use these with CIL as follows:
cd cil-1.3.7; tar xfz cil-llvm-tests.tar.gz # extract tests in CIL
./configure --with-llvm; make # build CIL with llvm support
cd tests/llvm
make # run simple LLVM tests
make cfrac # run a larger LLVM test
Disclaimer: this works for me on Mac OS X 10.4 and on a Linux CentOS
machine, with LLVM 2.5. YMMV...
Please submit bug reports, or improvements (e.g. removing some of the
limitations above ;-)) via CIL's sourceforge bug tracker, at
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?gro...
2011 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] Greedy register allocation
...:
-7.3% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/Output/security-rijndael
-7.2% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/Output/simulator
-5.3% MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/Output/hexxagon
-5.2% MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/Output/SIBsim4
-4.8% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/Output/cfrac
-4.1% MultiSource/Applications/d/Output/make_dparser
-4.0% MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/Output/ldecod
-3.9% External/Nurbs/Output/nurbs
-3.7% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/Output/bc
-3.4% MultiSource/Applications/lemon/Output/lemon
-3.4% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Outpu...
2018 Apr 26
0
Compare test-suite benchmarks performance complied without TBAA, with default TBAA and with new TBAA struct path
...| 1.29 | 3.32 | 8.75 | 8.75 |
|MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset.| 1.18 | 1.06 | 0.87 | 0.87 |
|MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa.test | 1.11 | 1.22 | 2.61 | 2.61 |
|MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.test | 1.06 | 1.22 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
|MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.test | 1.05 | 1.28 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
|MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/HPCCG/HPCCG.test | 0.59 | 0.84 | 1.66 | 1.66 |
|MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat...
2010 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK] Inline asm multiple alternative constraints
...ED! ********************
******************** TEST (cbe) 'fhourstones3.1' FAILED!
********************
******************** TEST (cbe) 'bh' FAILED! ********************
******************** TEST (cbe) 'health' FAILED! ********************
******************** TEST (cbe) 'cfrac' FAILED! ********************
******************** TEST (cbe) 'espresso' FAILED! ********************
******************** TEST (cbe) 'gs' FAILED! ********************
******************** TEST (cbe) 'agrep' FAILED! ********************
******************** TEST (cbe) ...
2015 Feb 26
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] AArch64: Should we disable GlobalMerge?
Hi all,
I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on
ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for
AArch64.
As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB
(AArch64, 128B on ARM).
At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost
free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".
2010 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK] Inline asm multiple alternative constraints
...t; ******************** TEST (cbe) 'fhourstones3.1' FAILED!
> ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'bh' FAILED! ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'health' FAILED! ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'cfrac' FAILED! ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'espresso' FAILED!
> ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'gs' FAILED! ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'agrep' FAILED! ********************
> *******...
2010 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK] Inline asm multiple alternative constraints
...> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'fhourstones3.1' FAILED!
> ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'bh' FAILED! ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'health' FAILED! ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'cfrac' FAILED! ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'espresso' FAILED! ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'gs' FAILED! ********************
> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'agrep' FAILED! ********************
> **************...
2010 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK] Inline asm multiple alternative constraints
...********* TEST (cbe) 'fhourstones3.1' FAILED!
>> ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'bh' FAILED! ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'health' FAILED! ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'cfrac' FAILED! ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'espresso' FAILED! ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'gs' FAILED! ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'agrep' FAILED! ********************
>>...
2010 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK] Inline asm multiple alternative constraints
...******* TEST (cbe) 'fhourstones3.1' FAILED!
>> ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'bh' FAILED! ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'health' FAILED! ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'cfrac' FAILED! ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'espresso' FAILED!
>> ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'gs' FAILED! ********************
>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'agrep' FAILED! *****************...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
.../Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk | * | * |
MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk...
2010 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK] Inline asm multiple alternative constraints
...cbe) 'fhourstones3.1' FAILED!
>>> ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'bh' FAILED! ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'health' FAILED! ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'cfrac' FAILED! ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'espresso' FAILED! ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'gs' FAILED! ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'agrep' FAILED! ****************...
2010 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK] Inline asm multiple alternative constraints
...ones3.1' FAILED!
>>> ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'bh' FAILED! ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'health' FAILED!
>>> ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'cfrac' FAILED! ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'espresso' FAILED!
>>> ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'gs' FAILED! ********************
>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'agrep' FAILED! *...
2010 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] [REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK] Inline asm multiple alternative constraints
...>>>> ********************
>>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'bh' FAILED! ********************
>>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'health' FAILED!
>>>> ********************
>>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'cfrac' FAILED!
>>>> ********************
>>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'espresso' FAILED!
>>>> ********************
>>>> ******************** TEST (cbe) 'gs' FAILED! ********************
>>>> ******************** T...
2013 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
...0.47846889952154
Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark 5.9521 5.9811 0.48722299692545
Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-dbl/Cros 2.6449 2.6578 0.48773110514575
Applications/SPASS/SPASS 5.9442 5.9748 0.51478752397294
Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac 1.2635 1.2704 0.54610209734862
Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks 0.7054 0.7117 0.89311029203288
Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso 0.3836 0.3871 0.91240875912408
Applications/JM/lencod/lencod 3.7442 3.7859 1...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.76 | 0.98 0.69 n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft | 0.4160 99264 0.6636 * 0.6371 | 0.31 0.35 0.31 * 1.00 | 0.89 1.00 n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac | 0.4226 113596 0.4637 * 0.4274 | 4.75 4.60 4.56 * 5.01 | 1.03 1.04 n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso | 2.6235 602160 3.1388 * 1.9914...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.56 | 1.02 1.47 n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft | 0.4480 96420 0.7680 * 0.7040 | 0.51 0.51 0.46 * 1.23 | 1.00 1.11 n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac | 0.3880 107872 0.5560 * 0.5280 | 5.26 5.01 5.32 * 6.00 | 1.05 0.99 n/a n/a
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso | 2.9441 598144 4.1082 * 2.5841...
2013 Jul 18
3
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got
chance to list a detailed pass order
for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations.
This is wish-list in our mind:
pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or
just inline tiny func), get rid of
all loop xforms...
post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only