search for: cfp2000

...configured using: ./configure --with-spec2000=/work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src --without-f2c --with-f95-bin=/work/NAG_f95/bin --with-f95-lib=/work/NAG_f95/lib -- with-f95-inc=/work/NAG_f95/lib When running 'make VERBOSE=1' in llvm-test/External/SPEC, I get the following output: if [ ! -f CFP2000/Makefile ]; \ then \ /work/LLVM/1.7/llvm/autoconf/mkinstalldirs CFP2000; \ cp /work/LLVM/1.7/llvm/TestSuite/llvm-test/External/SPEC/ CFP2000/Makefile CFP2000/Makefile; \ fi; \ make -C CFP2000 all make[1]: Entering directory `/home/kehoste/work/LLVM/1.7/llvm/ TestSuite/llvm-test/Ex...

Hello folks, The makefile for 177.mesa says that for a small problem size, it will get 100 frames. But in the spec sources I have, the test folder only contains numbers for 10 frames: $ speccpu2000/benchspec/CFP2000/177.mesa/data $ wc -l test/input/numbers 10 test/input/numbers Generating 100 frames causes undefined behaviour because the program is doing unchecked fscanf on that "numbers" file. Is my version of spec wrong ? If not, can we apply the attached patch ? Thanks, Julien -- Julien...

...m comparing the performance of the default scheduler (seems to be the one that minimizes register pressure) with no scheduler (-pre-RA-sched=none), and I got these numbers. The ratio is low_reg_pressure/none, that is, the lower the number, the better the performance with low register pressure: CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa 1.00 CFP2000/179.art/179.art 0.98 CFP2000/183.equake/183.equake 1.00 CFP2000/188.ammp/188.ammp 0.98 CINT2000/164.gzip/164.gzip 0.97 CINT2000/175.vpr/175.vpr 0.97 CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc...

On Dec 23, 2009, at 6:26 PM, Julien Lerouge wrote: > Hello folks, > > The makefile for 177.mesa says that for a small problem size, it will > get 100 frames. But in the spec sources I have, the test folder only > contains numbers for 10 frames: > > $ speccpu2000/benchspec/CFP2000/177.mesa/data $ wc -l test/input/ > numbers > 10 test/input/numbers > > Generating 100 frames causes undefined behaviour because the program > is > doing unchecked fscanf on that "numbers" file. > > Is my version of spec wrong ? What you say is true in the...

Anyone know what to do about this: make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/CFP2000/173.applu' make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/CFP2000/178.galgel' /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec//CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90 -o modules.c -fixed -kind=byte -dcfuns -dusty f95: unrecognized option '-kind=byte' f951: war...

...>> enforce this? > > Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or whatever. OK, I seem to be getting closer to the problem... When compiling a single benchmark, I noticed the following... /work/NAG_f95/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec/ CFP2000/168.wupwise/src/dcabs1.f -o dcabs1.c -dusty -dcfuns Evaluation trial version of NAGWare Fortran 95 Release 5.1(216) /home/kehoste/work/LLVM/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-linux/bin/llvm-gcc - DSPEC_CPU2000 -I/home/kehoste/work/LLVM/1.8/llvm/projects/llvm-test/ External/SPEC/CFP2000/168.wupwise -I/home/keh...

On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on this. Can you > show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? It is identical to yours. > Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How can I > enforce this? Go into the directory for that benchmark, then run 'make' or whatever. -Chris --

...ing for nag-fortran bin/lib/include locations... found via -- with options checking sanity for program f95... yes I then cd into llvm-test/External/SPEC and run make to compile the benchmarks to LLVM bytecode. Make stops with the following error messages: /work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec/CFP2000/189.lucas/src/ lucas_distrib_spec.f90:2995: error: syntax error before ‘(’ token /work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec/CFP2000/189.lucas/src/ lucas_distrib_spec.f90:2999: error: redefinition of ‘pTmp4’ /work/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec/CFP2000/189.lucas/src/ lucas_distrib_spec.f90:225: error:...

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000 benchmark > suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem > I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support is > already available it seems (using f2c). ok. > Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of Fortran-77 >

...utput result in bold corresponds to "lli time" in Makefile.spec ? I am not interested in llc, jit or cbe.I simply need the normal bytecode and native code execution times after running my pass over them.I have modified the Makefile for the same. >>> ========= '/External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa' Program --------------------------------------------------------------- TEST-PASS: compile /External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa TEST-RESULT-compile: Total Execution Time: 45.1751 seconds (45.1877 wall clock) TEST-RESULT-compile: 541814 Output/177.mesa.llvm.bc TEST...

On 31 Aug 2006, at 19:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> When I adjust the settings in Makefile.nagfortran as follows, I'm >> able to get bytecode file for lucas, galgel and facerec, but make >> still quits with an error (after generating >> bytecode files for 7 (out of 26) benchmarks. >> >> Also, the file

Hello LLVM-people, I've been trying (on and off) to compile the _full_ SPEC CPU2000 benchmark suite to LLVM bytecode. The biggest problem I'm facing is the Fortran benchmarks, for which some partial support is already available it seems (using f2c). Unfortunately the f2c compiler only allows the translation of Fortran-77 programs to C code (which is then compiled using llvm-gcc).

...ce/Applications/d/Output/make_dparser -4.0% MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/Output/ldecod -3.9% External/Nurbs/Output/nurbs -3.7% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/Output/bc -3.4% MultiSource/Applications/lemon/Output/lemon -3.4% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Output/bigfib -3.4% External/SPEC/CFP2000/183.equake/Output/183.equake -3.2% MultiSource/Applications/hbd/Output/hbd -3.1% MultiSource/Applications/minisat/Output/minisat -3.0% MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/Output/tramp3d-v4 -2.9% External/skidmarks10/Output/skidmarks -2.9% MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/Output/smg2000 -2.8...

...-Os Speed -O3 Speed HMMER/hmmcalibrate 0.10% 0.00% 18.18% 0.00% Nurbs/nurbs 0.00% 0.00% 49.01% -0.81% Povray/povray 0.01% 6.02% 39.36% -2.53% SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa 0.00% 0.00% 14.90% -1.12% SPEC/CFP2000/179.art/179.art 0.00% 0.00% 19.51% 1.22% SPEC/CFP2000/183.equake/183.equake 0.00% -1.85% 3.54% 0.00% SPEC/CFP2000/188.ammp/188.ammp 0.28% -0.18% 48.68% 3.10% SPEC...

On 25 Nov 2006, at 09:02, Reid Spencer wrote: > Anyone know what to do about this: > > make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/173.applu' > make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/178.galgel' > /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec// > CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90 -o modules.c -fixed -kind=byte - > dcfuns -dusty > f95: unrecognized o...

...er significant modification/addition missing ?? 2) Using llvm-test : I get this error after a long time when it enters into Spec directory. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- `/home/tsharma/llvm-cvs/llvm/projects/llvm-test/External/SPEC/CFP2000' > gmake[4]: Entering directory > `/home/tsharma/llvm-cvs/llvm/projects/llvm-test/External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa' > gmake[4]: *** No rule to make target `Output/accum.rbc', needed by > `Output/177.mesa.linked.rbc'. Stop. > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > --------...

...e detection of my system. I guess this has more to do with the NAG compiler than with LLVM itself. Nevertheless, I wanted to mention it. llvm-gcc <with-a-bunch-of-options> -O3 -S dcabs1.c -o Output/ dcabs1.ll -emit-llvm In file included from <path>/SPEC_CPU2000_1.3_src/benchspec/ CFP2000/168.wupwise/src/dcabs1.f:1: <path>/lib/f95.h:109: error: syntax error before ‘Logical4’ <path>/lib/f95.h:109: warning: data definition has no type or sto rage class <path>/lib/f95.h:118: error: syntax error before ‘Integer4’ ... Affected SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks: wupwise,...

On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > fixed-point number could be stored in LLVM first class integer types. > i cannot see the problem now. but to be type-safe, there should be a > first class 'fixed'. There is no need. Lowering is fine, in the same way that enums or typedefs are currently lowered to llvm integer types. > some llvm extensions required to mapping

...0.0019 External/SPEC/CINT2006/401_bzip2/401_bzip2 1.50% 1.0613 1.0772 0.0010 MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4 1.23% 12.1337 12.2831 0.0296 MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc 1.15% 9.3690 9.4769 0.0186 SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit 1.13% 3.2769 3.3139 0.0079 External/SPEC/CFP2000/188_ammp/188_ammp 1.01% 1.8632 1.8820 0.0059 Performance Regressions - Execution Time Δ Previous Current σ MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh 19.24% 1.1551 1.3773 0.0021 SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt 3.75% 5.8779 6.0983 0.0146 SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/ray 1.08% 1.8194 1.83...

...s might work for you: make TEST=nightly report DISABLE_LLC=1 DISABLE_CBE=1 You can also use the 'report.csv', 'report.html', or 'report.tex' targets if you're interested in importing the table into other tools. -Chris >>>> ========= '/External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa' Program > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > TEST-PASS: compile /External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa > > TEST-RESULT-compile: Total Execution Time: 45.1751 seconds (45.1877 wall clock) > > TEST-RESULT-compile: 541...