search for: cfgadm

Folks, I''m trying to figure out whether we should give ZFS / mpxio a shot on one of our research servers, or simply skip it (as we have previously). In Nov 2009 Cindy responded to a thread concerning ZFS device issues, cfgadm, and mpxio: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-November/033496.html I''ve got an x2270 with the Sun EZ-SAS HBA and external SATA JBODs (not J4xxx). The external disks simply provide bulk storage; lousy performance is not a concern, reliability is. For obscure reason...

Author: vikram Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 7cb2dd61ac3bb5d96888dbfeb5be96c2ab5b7ff0 Log message: 6264767 cfgadm expects to write into string constants Files: update: usr/src/cmd/cfgadm/Makefile update: usr/src/cmd/cfgadm/cfgadm.c update: usr/src/lib/cfgadm_plugins/usb/common/cfga_configfile.c

We recently upgraded last week to OpenSolaris Development snv_128a and all things went fine, zpool still works, etc. Our disks come off a Hitachi Disk Array and we have 2 qLogic fiber cards in our server. "cfgadm -al" use to report the cards and "luxadm probe" use to return all the disks on the array. "luxadm probe" now returns "ERROR: No Fibre Channel Adapters found." and "cfgadm -al" doesn''t report the cards which we find odd since the zpool is still...

Author: akolb Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 9d3008a3418986c9f79c8afb06bca932abb62b95 Log message: 6283577 cfgadm configure panic - NULL pointer (mmu_fsr) dereferenced in module "ip" Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/inet/ip/ip_squeue.c

Author: mathue Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 331ff87e40d7cd5790ee669aa896106c436c29ca Log message: 6309217 gcc and "ac" cfgadm plugin don''t get along 6309344 gcc and i2c drivers don''t get along 6309394 gcc and audio drivers don''t get along 6309413 gcc and hpc3130_dak.c don''t get along 6309459 gcc and gpio_87317 don''t get along 6309470 gcc and grfans don''t get along 631...

...c0t6006048000038794003753594D333841d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6006048000038794003753594D333842d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6006048000038794003753594D333843d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6006048000038794003753594D333844d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 but cfgadm shows disk names like: c4::5006048dc7dfb170 c5::5006048dc7dfb17e c7::5006048dc7dfb17e How do these numbers break down? I noticed the zpool or /dev/dsk nubmers all have a ''D'' in them, what is represented by the number after the ''D''? What is the number before t...

Hi guys, I have a quick question, I am playing around with ZFS and here''s what I did. I created a storage pool with several drives. I unplugged 3 out of 5 drives from the array, currently: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM gpool UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas raidz1 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas c8t2d0 UNAVAIL 0 0

If it''s of interest, I''ve written up some articles on my experiences of building a ZFS NAS box which you can read here: http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/ I used CIFS to share the filesystems, but it will be a simple matter to use NFS instead: issue the command ''zfs set sharenfs=on pool/filesystem'' instead of ''zfs set

So, I was running my full backup last night, backing up my main data pool zp1, and it seems to have hung. Any suggestions for additional data gathering? -bash-3.2$ zpool status zp1 pool: zp1 state: ONLINE status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable. action: Upgrade the pool using ''zpool

Hello SUN gurus I do not know if this is supported, I have a created a zpool consisting of the SAN resources and created a zfs file system. Using third part software I have taken snapshots of all luns in the zfs pool. My question is in a recovery situation is there a way for me to mount the snapshots and import the pool while the original is still active. Right now all I am able to do is export

...2. Once Grub finally finds the OS disk, OpenSolaris sits and hangs at the splash screen (verbose doesn''t even work) If I boot the system without any of these drives attached and then attach one, I get "Device failed to power up", and I can''t configure them with cfgadm or use them to create a pool. Every other disk I''ve tried in the box appears to work perfectly fine, so it appears to only be these ES.2s which are having a problem. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Richard

Hello, I have a CyberPower CP1500PFCLCD and I'm trying to get nut to see it under OpenIndiana. All search online suggested that it basically can't happen, but I decided to ask again, maybe things have changed since then. The UPS can be seen by the system: # /usr/sbin/cfgadm -lv usb9/1.1 Ap_Id Receptacle Occupant Condition Information When Type Busy Phys_Id usb9/1.1 connected configured ok Mfg: CP1500PFCLCD Product: CRCA102-3I1 NConfigs: 1 Config: 0 <no cfg str descr> unava...

...and rereading the manpages in between. So I don''t have the complete output. Maybe anyone can make something of this and tell me how I can make sure my /export/home mirror is in the best possible state. Here comes the (partially incomplete) output of what I had, have done, and have now: # cfgadm -la c2 Ap_Id Type Receptacle Occupant Condition c2 scsi-bus connected configured unknown c2::dsk/c2t9d0 disk connected configured unknown c2::dsk/c2t10d0 disk connected...

...isk I thought was a dud, so I pulled the fifth disk in my array and put the dud in. Sure enough, Solaris started spitting errors like there was no tomorrow in dmesg, and wouldn''t use the disk. Ah well. Remove it, put the original back in - hey, Solaris still thinks the disk is offline, and cfgadm -c unconfigure [disk];cfgadm -c configure [disk] didn''t help - okay, sane poweroff. Hey, this is going to take awhile to rescrub, why not switch to the wide SCSI module for this disk array rather than the narrow one? Okay, fine, put the module in (this module is known working and was, in f...

...ed to respond to I/O requests and we get tons of the following messages on /var/adm/messages: Sep 3 15:20:10 fb2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /scsi_vhci/disk at g20000004cfd81b9f (sd52): Sep 3 15:20:10 fb2 SCSI transport failed: reason ''timeout'': giving up "cfgadm -al" or "devfsadm -C" didn''t solve the problem. After a reboot ZFS recognized the drive as failed and all worked well. Do we need to restart Solaris after a drive failure?? Gino This message posted from opensolaris.org

hi all, i would like to ask some questions regarding best practices for zfs recovery if disk errors occur. currently i have zfs boot (nv62) and the following setup: 2 si3224 controllers (each 4 sata disks) 8 sata disks, same size, same type i have two pools: a) rootpool b) datapool the rootpool is a mirrored pool, where every disk has a slice (the s0, which is 5 % of the whole disk) and this

Greetings, We''re trying out a new JBOD here. Multipath (mpxio) is not working, and we could use some feedback and/or troubleshooting advice. The OS is oi151a7, running on an existing server with a 54TB pool of internal drives. I believe the server hardware is not relevant to the JBOD issue, although the internal drives do appear to the OS with multipath device names (despite the fact

I read Ben Rockwood''s blog post about Thumpers and SMART (http://cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=993). Will the SUNWhd package only work on a Thumper? Can I use this on my snv_101 system with AMD 64 bit processor and nVidia SATA?

hello, all I am have constraint disk space (only 8GB) while running os inside vm. Now i want to add more. It is easy to add for vm but how can i update fs in os? I cannot use autoexpand because it doesn''t implemented in my system: $ uname -a SunOS sopen 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc If it was 171 it would be grate, right? Doing following: o added new virtual HDD (it becomes

...needs more. I hoped ZFS autoexpand would do the trick transparently, but it turned out some manual labor is needed. Even though this was a single-disk pool with a dedicated disk, the EFI label and ultimate Solaris partition and slices did not detect the size change over several devfsadm''s, cfgadm''s, exports, imports, reboots, formats and fdisks - only when I entered some values by hand did things work out. Many solutions just added a bigger disk, mirrored the pool and removed the smaller disk, and were left with a bigger pool. Sometimes for whatever architectural reason, this way...