search for: cessu

...with a different representation of the (non-pointer) data type. Or checking (by checksum exchange) whether the computational states match in a set of mutually replicating computers running in lockstep. (I've actually done all of these, although without the involvement of LLVM.) -- ; mailto:cessu at iki.fi http://www.iki.fi/~cessu http://cessu.blogspot.com ((lambda(a) (a a((lambda(a)(lambda()(set! a(+ a 1))a))1)))(lambda(a c) ((lambda(b) (newline)(write b)(a a((lambda(c)(lambda()(c c)))(lambda(a) ((lambda(c) (if(=(modulo c b)0)(a a)c))(c))))))(c)))) ; Scheme me!

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Joshua Warner <joshuawarner32 at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Talin, >> >> Sorry to interject - >> >> >>> For example, suppose I have a type "String or (float, float, float)" - >>> that is, a union of a string and a

I think I'm one of the few people actually using LLVM's support for garbage collection, and so far I've found it very difficult to generate code that uses llvm.gcroot() correctly. In the current scheme, it is the frontend's responsibility to insure that any intermediate SSA values containing references to garbage collectible objects are copied to stack variables so that the GC