search for: centi

Hi All, I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one more than we (or I) want to support. I don't know of any support in autoconf past the --host/--build/--target case that's not supported in cmake. I'll send out an asser...

...generator. So something like cmake <stuff>; make check-all works already. Or did you have something else in mind? -eric On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> Hi All, >> >> I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. >> >> We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one >> more than we (or I) want to support. >> >> I don't know of any support in autoconf past the >> --host/--build/--target case that'...

...switch, CGP, CG. I think we actually want most of the post CGSCC module passes to run after the vectorizers and before LSR to fold away constants and globals that look different after vectorization compared to before, but aren't significantly shifted by LSR and CGP. I don't want to start a centi-thread yet, but here's a very rough idea (leaving many things out): Canonicalize { Func { SimpCFG SROA-1 EarlyCSE } CGSCC { Inline EarlyCSE SimpCFG InstCombine Early Loop Opts { LoopSimplify Rotate Obvious-Full-Unroll } SROA-2...

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi All, > > I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. > > We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one > more than we (or I) want to support. > > I don't know of any support in autoconf past the > --host/--build/--target case that's not supported in cmake...

----- Original Message ----- > Hi All, > > I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. > > We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one > more than we (or I) want to support. > > I don't know of any support in autoconf past the > --host/--build/--target case that's not supported in cma...

On 22 May 2013 16:14, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. > > We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one > more than we (or I) want to support. > > I don't know of any support in autoconf past the > --host/--build/--target case that's not supported in cmake...

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > I don't want to start a centi-thread yet, but here's a very rough idea > (leaving many things out): I actually like the look of this. I'll hack things around so we have a flag (or set) we can use to experiment. It would be great to get the bits factored out of IndvarSimplify so that we can run the experiments more...

...cts/test-suite. Maybe CMake can just invoke the necessary sub-configure? -Hal > > -eric > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a > >> shot. > >> > >> We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely > >> one > >> more than we (or I) want to support. > >> > >> I don't know of any support in autoconf pas...

...Cutting out autoconf reduces the number of combinations per build from 8 to 4. This probably doesn't matter to most people but it would be great for us. paul On 2013-05-22 7:14 PM, "Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: >Hi All, > >I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. > >We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one >more than we (or I) want to support. > >I don't know of any support in autoconf past the >--host/--build/--target case that's not supported in cmake. I&...

...ombinations per build from 8 to 4. This probably doesn't matter to most > people but it would be great for us. > > paul > > On 2013-05-22 7:14 PM, "Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. >> >> We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one >> more than we (or I) want to support. >> >> I don't know of any support in autoconf past the >> --host/--build/--target case that...

On May 22, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. > > We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one > more than we (or I) want to support. > > I don't know of any support in autoconf past the > --host/--build/--target case that's not supported in cma...

...t; > I *DO* respect that Timo has to keep the lights (and sauna) on in Finland. > Maybe there's a super-secret (no advertised prices, "carrier-only" price list) > with _Dovecot, Oy_ wherein the above ARE actually available for something less > than 6.022 x 10^23 Euros per centi-second of licencing fees. > > But please, level with us faithful users. Does this morass of Java B.S. > actually work, and if not, please just deprecate and remove this moribund > software, and stop trying to bury the only FTS plugin many of us HAVE actually > gotten to work. (Pre...

...respect that Timo has to keep the lights (and sauna) on in Finland. > > Maybe there's a super-secret (no advertised prices, "carrier-only" price list) > > with _Dovecot, Oy_ wherein the above ARE actually available for something less > > than 6.022 x 10^23 Euros per centi-second of licencing fees. > > > > But please, level with us faithful users. Does this morass of Java B.S. > > actually work, and if not, please just deprecate and remove this moribund > > software, and stop trying to bury the only FTS plugin many of us HAVE actually > &...

...t; > > > Maybe there's a super-secret (no advertised prices, "carrier- > > > > only" price list) > > > > with _Dovecot, Oy_ wherein the above ARE actually available for > > > > something less > > > > than 6.022 x 10^23 Euros per centi-second of licencing fees. > > > > > > > > But please, level with us faithful users. Does this morass of > > > > Java B.S. > > > > actually work, and if not, please just deprecate and remove > > > > this moribund > > > > softw...

...;m sure there'll be happiness all around. The good news is: all the other experimental programs seem to work fine. I've tested dumpvid, encoderwin, and transcoder, and they seem OK. Back to your regular hacking, then ... -- : Andr? Pang (x4180) : Software Engineer, Networked Media : CeNTIE

Speaking of portability and people more familiar with SDL: The reason we have two example players for theora is that monty wrote the original example around the OSS audio interface used on several free unix-like operating systems, which immediately excludes win32 and MacOS, even though it used SDL to display the frames. SDL also has audio support, and is quite widely ported. splayer replaces

...n), and do the standard ./configure && make && make install mantra. Anyway, if you have more of a C++ bent or just want an alternative to libogg on UNIX, have a look at the oggdsf-derived libraries. Happy hacking! -- : Andr? Pang (x4180) : Software Engineer, Networked Media : CeNTIE

...n), and do the standard ./configure && make && make install mantra. Anyway, if you have more of a C++ bent or just want an alternative to libogg on UNIX, have a look at the oggdsf-derived libraries. Happy hacking! -- : Andr? Pang (x4180) : Software Engineer, Networked Media : CeNTIE

...eces to work together. I *DO* respect that Timo has to keep the lights (and sauna) on in Finland. Maybe there's a super-secret (no advertised prices, "carrier-only" price list) with _Dovecot, Oy_ wherein the above ARE actually available for something less than 6.022 x 10^23 Euros per centi-second of licencing fees. But please, level with us faithful users. Does this morass of Java B.S. actually work, and if not, please just deprecate and remove this moribund software, and stop trying to bury the only FTS plugin many of us HAVE actually gotten to work. (Pretty please?) I respect t...

...t; > I *DO* respect that Timo has to keep the lights (and sauna) on in Finland. > Maybe there's a super-secret (no advertised prices, "carrier-only" price list) > with _Dovecot, Oy_ wherein the above ARE actually available for something less > than 6.022 x 10^23 Euros per centi-second of licencing fees. > > But please, level with us faithful users. Does this morass of Java B.S. > actually work, and if not, please just deprecate and remove this moribund > software, and stop trying to bury the only FTS plugin many of us HAVE actually > gotten to work. (Pre...