search for: celpe

Hello Jean-Marc and all, I recently had a talk with somebody about CELP. He said, there is this federal standard 1016 (4.8kbps) with a reference implementation of the Department of Defense (only on Sun, unfortunately, if I got this right). This one is noticed in the manual already. He also said, since there is this implementation of the DoD, nobody would voluntarily re-implement CELP. If I read

What??s happening with this following code: require(sem) Celpe.Mod.RAM <- matrix(c( # path parametro Inicio "Produ????o -> T1", "gamma.11", NA, "Produ????o -> T2", "gamma.12", NA,...

Jean-Marc, I am building a tool for producing the highest possible quality Internet interviews for "podcasting" applications. The goal is to produce a perfect recording of an interview or conference -- and giving the participants a glitch-free experience is secondary. My approach, therefore, is to build a Windows "wave" file asynchronously by using a streaming

Hi there, I've just started to work with the great speex encoder on ARM9-based embedded platform. This is my configuration: CPU: Cirrus Logic EP9315 @ 200 MHz (ARM920T) o.s.: Linux 2.6.9-rc2-ep93xx GCC: gcc version 3.3.3 (DENX ELDK 3.1 3.3.3-10) without MaverickCrunch support ogg library: 1.0 speex command line configuration: ./configure --enable-fixed-point --enable-arm4-asm The code is

Hello kind developers, I am planning on creating a steganographic extension for speex/CELP. Since speex/CELP is lossy, there should be quite many bits that one can use for hiding data. I'm familiar with the principles of CELP (two filter loops, one for pitch, the other for formants, let the raw speech frame run through those filter loops, take residue signal, map it on a codebook entry,

Am Dienstag, 13. Mai 2003 03:22 schrieb Allen Drennan: > Hello, > > HawkVoice doesn't have a 6.3kbps codec for CELP, it has a 4.5kbps CELP > codec and I do not believe it is being used by TeamSpeak. The 6.4kbps CELP > being used in TeamSpeak, to which you are referring I believe comes from > Lernout & Hauspie's LHACM.ACM file which it appears you are redistributing

Hello, the voice-communication TeamSpeak (www.teamspeak.org) is currently testing a version that supports speex codecs. The quality for high bitrates is quite good. BUT, the low-bandwidth speex codecs that are currently used arent very good. What I did to find this out: I comprared a speex AVB with 6.3 KBit/sec (total, overhead for packets and stuff included) and the 6.3 Kbit/sec Celp Codec

Hi All, First of all, I'm sorry if my question is offtopic on this list. In such case please ignore this post and/or contact me directly. I'm asking my questions there because I feel you had similar problem before starting developing Speex. My story: my friend developed 3gpp content creator and he would distribute it in binary form. But there is problem with AMR licensing (the terms

hi i have file based on PHILIPS celp mpeg-4 is it possible to open this file using speex?? or your company codec? file is attached in this email Best Regards Pozdrawiamy Zesp?? Net Com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: vsi.img Type: application/octet-stream Size: 323274 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Hello, HawkVoice doesn't have a 6.3kbps codec for CELP, it has a 4.5kbps CELP codec and I do not believe it is being used by TeamSpeak. The 6.4kbps CELP being used in TeamSpeak, to which you are referring I believe comes from Lernout & Hauspie's LHACM.ACM file which it appears you are redistributing (I assume TeamSpeak has a license and permission to do this). The only people I

And the main point of interest is the following: how much difference in SPEEX terms would it be if it were developed with ACELP in mind? (not that i would do an aSpeex codec implementing ACELP, just to know and point my efforts) -- John Villar Gerente de Proyectos Computadores Flor Hard Soft 2058 C.A. www.florhard.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Without seeing some examples of your Speex implementation, it would be difficult to comment. I can tell you that you need to make that the conversion between floating point and fixed is done properly. This seems to be a common problem. Also, I am confident that TeamSpeak is using LHACM.ACM and distributing it. While HawkVoice is being distributed, it doesn't appear to be used at all.

Jim, Thank you very much for your suggestions. I managed to get the C55x code working on the simulator. I would like to port Speex both on a C5502 EVM and a C5509A EVM. As such, if you can provide me with the details of your port on the C5509A, it would be greatly appreciated. Furthermore, I am looking for some technical documentation on the CELP algorithms. I would like to better

Hi, We would like to announce the first release of the Speex project. Speex (http://speex.sourceforge.net) is an open-source (LGPL), patent-free compression format allowing an alternative to expensive proprietary codecs. Unlike Ogg Vorbis which compresses general audio, Speex is designed especially for speech. For that reason, Speex is meant to be a complement to Vorbis. Since it is specialized

Hello I'm working about audio and video codecs. I'm making a research about the state-of-the-art in coding technologies. My question is about the speex codec 1.0. I would like to know the name of the algorithms that it uses.(LPC,CELP..). It uses more or less the same algorithm for narrowband and wideband? Finally i would like to ask about future codec developement projects. Thanks

> I am planning on creating a steganographic extension for speex/CELP. > Since speex/CELP is lossy, there should be quite many bits that one > can use for hiding data. Quite the opposite. Speex uses very few bits, so every bit you corrupt is likely to be heard. You would need to use "fractions of bits" at a time. Even then, it may be hard to hide data efficiently (so it's

thanks for the support.i am a masters student who is doing thesis to work on the CELP algorithm specifically calculating the time,space complexities of the algorithm.so i jus need your help i.e if u can show me the site or forward the material where i can get the time the calculated time complexity of your Speex CELP algorithm and i can pick it from there.PLEASE Send instant messages to your

(This is almost out of topic but anyway...) It is surprising how little research effort have been put into psy-acou models for CELP. The basic problem lies in that it is not easy to alter the LP model without distroying the minimum-phase property (ie. the stability of the predictor). That leaves us with psy-acou modelling of the noise-part only. However, my own research is in constrained

Hello, Jean-Marc Valin schrieb: >>I am planning on creating a steganographic extension for speex/CELP. >>Since speex/CELP is lossy, there should be quite many bits that one >>can use for hiding data. > > Quite the opposite. Speex uses very few bits, so every bit you corrupt > is likely to be heard. You would need to use "fractions of bits" at a > time.

Hi, Does anyone have an idea about the possibility to apply psychoacoustic models as the ones in mp3 or AAC to a CELP coder? Thanks! /Pontus <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the