Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "cefrodrigues".
2008 Oct 20
1
Megatec driver status [was: Re: UPS (Megatec) with strange voltage values]
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> wrote:
> Citeren Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at gmail.com>:
>
>> BTW, the patch has a small typo in one of the comments: "applied to
>> battery.volage" :)
>
> I'll leave that up to you to correct. Since it is only a comment, it won't
> be visible to innocent users anyway. :-)
>
> What we migh...
2008 Oct 06
4
UPS (Megatec) with strange voltage values
Hello Nut List!
I have 2 "Lacerda 10KVA" UPS that returns strange values for Q1 and F
commands:
Q1
(215.0 215.0 219.0 004 60.0 2.27 39.0 00000001
F
#220.0 045 240.0 60.0
At least what I know about Megatec, It seems to say that it has a 240.0 V
battery with currently 2.27V. Quite strange.
I contacted Lacerda to help me interpret this values and they said that 2.27
is just 1 element
2008 Dec 05
2
Mustek PowerMust 848
Hi,
I'm not the maintainter for the "megatec_usb" driver (in fact, I'm no
longer maintainer for the base "megatec" either), so I don't really
know the status for that particular UPS.
I'm forwarding this to the NUT mailing-list though.
Regards,
--
Carlos Rodrigues
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Czerniak
<adrian.czerniak at becomo.com> wrote:
2008 Dec 05
2
Mustek PowerMust 848
Hi,
I'm not the maintainter for the "megatec_usb" driver (in fact, I'm no
longer maintainer for the base "megatec" either), so I don't really
know the status for that particular UPS.
I'm forwarding this to the NUT mailing-list though.
Regards,
--
Carlos Rodrigues
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Czerniak
<adrian.czerniak at becomo.com> wrote:
2008 May 14
1
Fwd: Auto-discard notification
...the line in the file is mentioned. So it's
easier than searching and removing.
though I agree that Carlos' mentioned solution is cleaner.
-- Arnaud
8<------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Carlos Rodrigues" <cefrodrigues at mail.telepac.pt>
To: "Charles Lepple" <clepple at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 09:37:24 +0100
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsdev] [Alioth] SSH keys removed
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
> IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING...
2009 Jun 08
2
about nut revision 1289
Hi Carlos,
How do you do? :)
Can you please clarify the change introduced by the subj
(http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/changeset/1289)? I need to know in
particular why did you add these intervals between sending a command
and reading the response. They are the root of weird problems with
megatec_usb. Can I safely remove READ_PACE and usleep-s?
I tried to search the archives and found the
2007 Jun 18
2
Fwd: Megatec - modem control lines [impact to megatec_usb]
Hi,
Sorry for the forwarding. I sent this with the wrong "from" address
and got rejected by the list.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at mail.telepac.pt>
Date: Jun 18, 2007 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: Megatec - modem control lines [impact to megatec_usb]
To: Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org>
Cc: ups-dev-list <nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org>
On 6/18/07, Carlos Rodrigues <carlos.efr at mail.telepac.pt&g...
2008 Jul 03
3
megatec driver floods syslog with "UPS lost/re-established" messages
Hello,
I have bought Powerman Optima 500 Plus UPS. While this
product might be unknown outside Russia, it is shipped with
megatec software and obviously works with megatec driver in
NUT. besides the following problems (I think they are
caused by one reason):
1) megatac driver is able to load and detect UPS only on
second or third run. On the first run it typically fails.
Later if daemon is
2008 Jun 28
1
[nut-commits] svn commit r1502 - in trunk: . drivers man
Hi,
When running a driver with "-h" or without parameters, the
upsdrv_cleanup function seems to be called (which caused the warning I
mention in the ChangeLog). This doesn't seem right.
Regards,
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Carlos Rodrigues
<carlosefr-guest at alioth.debian.org> wrote:
> Author: carlosefr-guest
> Date: Sat Jun 28 18:47:17 2008
> New Revision:
2008 Dec 06
0
Some changes to megatec
Hi,
It took a while, but I've finally cleared my pending queue for the
megatec driver and the result is the following set of patches. The
changes are minor, just a couple of models to the compatibility list
and a new parameter "sendpace" so that a user can change the default
interval between command characters (which seems to be needed by at
least one model).
It builds,