Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cee90d28".
2013 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] x86: disambiguate unqualified btr, bts
On Jul 10, 2013, at 17:44, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote:
> The length specifier is, as I understand it, required when the instruction references memory but is optional (and inferred from the registers) for the register variants.
>
> The best reference I know of for the AT&T syntax is: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/817-5477/817-5477.pdf
I'm not sure
2013 Jul 11
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] x86: disambiguate unqualified btr, bts
...I want to make sure we do the right thing here and know why we’re doing it rather than just adding some aliases because it matches gas’ behavior.
-Jim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130710/cee90d28/attachment.html>
2013 Jul 10
6
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] x86: disambiguate unqualified btr, bts
On Jul 10, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
> <artagnon at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jim Grosbach wrote:
>>> To say that another way, is the assembler correctly diagnosing a previously
>>> unnoticed problem in the project source code, or is the assembler not
>>>