search for: cecx

...- * useless. + * useless. Note that MegaChips 2900-based adapters appear to have good + * support for CEC tunneling. Those adapters that I have tested using + * this chipset all have the CEC line connected. * * Sadly there is no way for this driver to know this. What happens is * that a /dev/cecX device is created that is isolated and unable to see -- 2.18.0

...- * useless. + * useless. Note that MegaChips 2900-based adapters appear to have good + * support for CEC tunneling. Those adapters that I have tested using + * this chipset all have the CEC line connected. * * Sadly there is no way for this driver to know this. What happens is * that a /dev/cecX device is created that is isolated and unable to see -- 2.18.0

From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> Repost because I wasn't a member of the nouveau mailinglist the first time around and this series was blocked. I also updated this cover letter for the part about the amdgpu patch after receiving feedback from Alex Deucher. The patches are unchanged (except for adding Alex' Acked-by to the amdgpu patch). Now that the DisplayPort

From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> Now that the DisplayPort CEC-Tunneling-over-AUX drm+i915 support has been merged in the mainline kernel it is time to roll this out to nouveau and amdgpu as well. The first patch is required for this: it adds checks that the drm_dp_cec functions are called with a working aux implementation. These checks weren't necessary for the i915, but

From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> Now that the DisplayPort CEC-Tunneling-over-AUX drm+i915 support has been merged in the mainline kernel it is time to roll this out to nouveau and amdgpu as well. I combined both in the same patch series since both depend on the same first patch, the comments in this cover letter apply to both and the implementation is also very similar (and