Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ce7a2037".
2011 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
Hi-
> Yep, but tripping the debugger is highly non-portable.
You're suggesting that inline asm is more portable than calling abort?
Alistair
2011 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
He wants to be able to resume execution from the debugger after
assertion failure.
Reid
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Alistair Lynn <arplynn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi-
>
>> Yep, but tripping the debugger is highly non-portable.
>
> You're suggesting that inline asm is more portable than calling abort?
>
> Alistair
>
>
2011 Jul 27
3
[LLVMdev] Proposal for better assertions in LLVM
...> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110726/ce7a2037/attachment.html>