search for: ce5a9d30

...are used from a bunch of different passes... > I agree, this seems like a bug. I plan to make this return a list in https://reviews.llvm.org/D37768. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170920/ce5a9d30/attachment.html>

Hi all, Thanks for the answers! I feel like I've hijacked your thread now though Björn, sorry for that. But from the answers it sounds like there is agreement that it's reasonable to remove the duplicates as done in Björn's patch? --- A couple of more things around the problem I saw. On 09/19/2017 05:40 PM, Adrian Prantl wrote: > A dbg.declare describes a stack-allocated

> On Sep 19, 2017, at 8:44 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Later loop unroll comes and unrolls the loop and then suddenly we have two absolutely identical dbg.declares and the assert in addFragmentOffset() blows.