Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ce1fc8d8".
2015 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
Daniel,
We are using 3.6. Someone also pointed out that it was mandatory in 3.6.2
but I have not verified that.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>
wrote:
> It's not supposed to be. There was a short period where it was
> unintentionally mandatory but this was fixed after I pointed it out during
> post-commit review.
>
>
2015 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
...ew-dags 'option' and now has a different priority program list or something.
I'm just curious why this option should be mandatory?
Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150727/ce1fc8d8/attachment.html>