search for: cdff

...rytime i reboot my server: shiva2# tail /var/log/messages Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 kernel: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 ntpd[385]: ntpd 4.2.0-a Tue Mar 14 04:43:54 UTC 2006 (1) Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 ntpd[385]: bind() fd 6, family 28, port 123, addr fe80:1::20b:cdff:fe42:3d63, in6_is_addr_multicast=0 flags=0 fails: Can't assign requested address Apr 5 15:32:46 shiva2 ntpd[385]: bind() fd 7, family 28, port 123, addr fe80:2::20b:cdff:fe42:3d62, in6_is_addr_multicast=0 flags=0 fails: Can't assign requested address Apr 5 15:32:47 shiva2 kernel: bge0:...

Hello, Is it normal that eth0 in domain0 is in promisc mode ? [root@vmaster ~]# ifconfig -a eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0B:CD:4D:C4:8A inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Bcast:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Mask: 255.255.255.248 inet6 addr: fe80::20b:cdff:fe4d:c48a/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3602633 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1783212 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:917612517 (875....

...I got event: No more alarm (5) on Primary D-channel of span 1 [Mar 26 18:39:24] NOTICE[3772]: chan_zap.c:6678 handle_init_event: Alarm cleared on channel 1 [Mar 26 18:39:24] NOTICE[3772]: chan_zap.c:6678 handle_init_event: Alarm cleared on channel 2 ... ... See the full output at http://sprunge.us/cdFf I enabled PRI debugging for span 1, which gives this: q921.c:709 q921_reset: q921_state now is Q921_LINK_CONNECTION_RELEASED Sending Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended q921.c:150 q921_send_sabme: q921_state now is Q921_AWAITING_ESTABLISH -- Got UA from network peer Link up. q921.c:709 q921_...

Hello, everyone - I have an old Windows app - a ship navigation program - that needs to see GPS input on a serial port (it was written in the pre-USB days.) My laptop, however, has no serial ports - but this same program, when run on a friend's Windows box, can read the GPS info from the USB-connected GPS via the "USB-Serial Driver". This is one of the frustrating bits of this

...ry D-channel of span 1 > [Mar 26 18:39:24] NOTICE[3772]: chan_zap.c:6678 handle_init_event: > Alarm cleared on channel 1 > [Mar 26 18:39:24] NOTICE[3772]: chan_zap.c:6678 handle_init_event: > Alarm cleared on channel 2 > ... > ... > > See the full output at http://sprunge.us/cdFf > > I enabled PRI debugging for span 1, which gives this: > > q921.c:709 q921_reset: q921_state now is Q921_LINK_CONNECTION_RELEASED > Sending Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended > q921.c:150 q921_send_sabme: q921_state now is Q921_AWAITING_ESTABLISH > -- Got UA from networ...

...ry D-channel of span 1 > [Mar 26 18:39:24] NOTICE[3772]: chan_zap.c:6678 handle_init_event: > Alarm cleared on channel 1 > [Mar 26 18:39:24] NOTICE[3772]: chan_zap.c:6678 handle_init_event: > Alarm cleared on channel 2 > ... > ... > > See the full output at http://sprunge.us/cdFf > > I enabled PRI debugging for span 1, which gives this: > > q921.c:709 q921_reset: q921_state now is Q921_LINK_CONNECTION_RELEASED > Sending Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended > q921.c:150 q921_send_sabme: q921_state now is Q921_AWAITING_ESTABLISH > -- Got UA from networ...

...00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:0b:cd:e7:f7:93 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.4/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::20b:cdff:fee7:f793/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: sit0: mtu 1480 qdisc noop link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0 > ip route show 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.4 default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0 The returned error condition follows from this command l...

> Thanks all point about security, I''ll do as follows. > I thought that the point was the following two. > > > 1. Storage place of encrypted password > Should I store it in /etc/xen/passwd ? > Or, should I wait for DB of Xen that will be released in > the future? The xend life cycle management patches were posted by Alistair a couple of months back.

Hello, Please see the following picture: http://www.wilson-kwok.com/pptp.jpg I used one to one NAT from 210.0.0.1 to 192.168.0.2 for web server, and then use port forwarding from 210.0.0.1 to 192.168.0.3 for pptp server, but I cannot connect from my home to pptp server. Here is the nat file: 210.0.0.1 eth0:2 192.168.0.2 Here is the rules