Displaying 20 results from an estimated 61 matches for "cdavis".
Did you mean:
davis
2010 Jan 13
7
[Bug 1697] New: scp transfers from remote cygwin machine fail with ssh versions >= 4.6
...ersions >= 4.6
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.6p1
Platform: ix86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: scp
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: cdavis at ingenuous.net
I am in France and try to load a 20 MB file from a server in
California. Thus from California to France. In California, the server
is a Dell 2650, running WIndows 2000 with cygwin installed. The ssh
version on that machine is 4.7. The server sits on a DSL line with a
maximum up...
2010 Apr 07
1
[LLVMdev] SoC 2010 Proposal
Here's my SoC 2010 proposal. I submitted it a long time ago (last week,
to be precise), but didn't post it to the list. You can review it here:
http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/show/google/gsoc2010/cdavis/t127000394358
Chip
2011 Mar 29
3
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] "Microsoft Direct3D shader bytecode backend" proposal
...tc. experience
I am a student at the Colorado School of Mines studying in Computer
Science. I am a Senior by year and credits, and I am set to graduate in
December of 2011. In addition, I have contributed to several open-source
projects, including Wine and LLVM.
6. Contact information
- E-mail: cdavis at mymail.mines.edu
- IRC nick: cdavis5x
Chip
2011 Mar 29
0
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] "Microsoft Direct3D shader bytecode backend" proposal
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu>wrote:
> Here's the other of my proposals for this year's Google Summer of Code.
> (The first is on cfe-dev.) It was suggested to me by Dan Kegel (from the
> Wine project, they really want this).
>
> Title: Microsoft Direct3D shader bytecode backend
&g...
2011 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] Where does LLVM mangle characters from llvm-ir names while generating native code?
In the case I posted I had removed that line, however, you still get the __3F_ in the generated assembly with it.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 25, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu> wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Michael Spencer wrote:
>
>> So I was taking a look at Microsoft C++ ABI support while on vacation,
>> and ran into a major issue. Given the following llvm-ir:
>>
>> $ clang++ -S -emit-llvm -O3 mangl...
2011 Sep 30
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] Add the returns_twice attribute
While I'd like to see support for hotpatching, the other Clang bugs
block it from being useful. If Mozilla is close to working, let them
have it.
Thanks for asking :).
-Austin
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 21:39, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu> wrote:
> Howdy Austin,
>
> I'm about to sacrifice the Hotpatch attribute (which I added a long time ago to start fixing PR10212 before you even filed it) so the Mozilla guys can have their ReturnsTwice attribute. The thing is, I didn't hook Hotpatch up to an...
2011 Mar 29
2
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] "Microsoft Direct3D shader bytecode backend" proposal
On 3/29/11 5:14 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu
> <mailto:cdavis at mymail.mines.edu>> wrote:
>
> Here's the other of my proposals for this year's Google Summer of Code.
> (The first is on cfe-dev.) It was suggested to me by Dan Kegel (from the
> Wine project, they really want this...
2011 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] Where does LLVM mangle characters from llvm-ir names while generating native code?
...right, and you should change the LLVM mangler to not mangle '?' chars (if the assembler can handle it). Or maybe we should see if GAS supports quoted symbols (MCAsmInfo::doesAllowQuotesInName()).
Chip
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 25, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Michael Spencer wrote:
>>
>>> So I was taking a look at Microsoft C++ ABI support while on vacation,
>>> and ran into a major issue. Given the following llvm-ir:
>>>
>>>...
2012 Jun 21
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
Le 21 juin 2012 à 11:34, Manuel Klimek a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu> wrote:
>
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote:
>> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there dev...
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu>wrote:
>
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to
>> stay around? Are t...
2011 Jun 04
4
[LLVMdev] Compiling whole programs to bitcode
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu> wrote:
> You can link your bitcode together with glibc's bitcode by using the
> llvm-link utility. Then you can run DCE over the bitcode with "opt -dce"
> and cull all the functions you don't need.
Right, that's still a reasonably straightforw...
2011 Nov 26
1
[LLVMdev] Where does LLVM mangle characters from llvm-ir names while generating native code?
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu> wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2011, at 2:22 PM, bigcheesegs at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> In the case I posted I had removed that line, however, you still get the __3F_ in the generated assembly with it.
> Huh. It only seems to happen with a Windows triple or a Linux tr...
2012 Jun 21
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
On Jun 20, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote:
> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
.../waf/
It is in my opinion far more better than cmake on any point (performance,
flexibility, easy to use, ...) ...
2012/6/21 Jean-Daniel Dupas <devlists at shadowlab.org>
>
> Le 21 juin 2012 à 11:34, Manuel Klimek a écrit :
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 20, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to...
2011 Mar 29
0
[LLVMdev] [GSoC] "Microsoft Direct3D shader bytecode backend" proposal
On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Charles Davis wrote:
> On 3/29/11 5:14 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu
>> <mailto:cdavis at mymail.mines.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Here's the other of my proposals for this year's Google Summer of Code.
>> (The first is on cfe-dev.) It was suggested to me by Dan Kegel (from the
>> Wine project, they...
2010 Feb 13
1
[LLVMdev] Problems with custom calling convention on Mac OS X
On 12 February 2010 14:01, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu> wrote:
> Something I'm doing right now may be of interest to you.
>
> Just today I added support for a new 'alignstack' function attribute.
> With it, you can force the stack to be 16-byte aligned (or n-byte
> aligned, if you so desire) in your fun...
2010 Apr 16
1
[LLVMdev] Generating incorrect bitcode file
On 4/16/10 12:17 AM, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> Pranav Garg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am generating the .bc file using the following command
>>
>> $ llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -S -o pointer.bc ../../../test/pointer.c
>>
>> But when I run any pass using opt it gives the following error :
>> $ ./opt -basicaa pointer.bc
>> ./opt: Bitcode stream should be a
2010 Apr 27
0
[LLVMdev] "clang -v" shows a GCC call
On 4/27/10 9:54 AM, Swiss Guy wrote:
>
> Thanks for your really fast answer.
>
> I understood that, but this means that the llvm+Clang suite is not able to
> create a machine binary file without any intervention of GCC ?
Not yet. We're working on it, though:
http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/intro-to-llvm-mc-project.html
2010 Apr 28
2
[LLVMdev] "clang -v" shows a GCC call
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:22:49 -0600, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu> wrote:
> Not yet. We're working on it, though:
>
> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/intro-to-llvm-mc-project.html
Is anyone actively working on adding ELF object file support to the MC
project?
2010 Oct 17
2
[LLVMdev] test-suite
Does test-suite work with clang, or do I still need llvm-gcc?