search for: cda1eec9

> > Having read all of these threads, I am thoroughly convinced by the positions put forward by others. > Chandler, others have decided to let the compiler continue mis-compiling the function-inlining example, others have decided to not fix the inability to hoist a loop invariant divide out of a loop. It sounds like you haven’t even thought about these things let alone

...are talking about here ? > > Please stop with (what I can only interpret as) personal attacks. I haven't forgotten what we are talking about. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170628/cda1eec9/attachment.html>