search for: cd9b5b03

Hi Bill, this proposal seems strangely complicated. I don't see the advantage of the dispatch instruction over just attaching the information to each invoke. Right now you have invoke void @_Z3foov() to label %invcont unwind label %catch.handlers catch.handlers: landingpad dispatch resume to label %... catches [ %struct.__fundamental_type_info_pseudo* @_ZTIi, label

...become part of the invokes, you don't need the funny > landing pad special semantics etc. > Could you describe GCC's region scheme? -bw -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20101201/cd9b5b03/attachment.html>

This is a revision of the second exception handling proposal I sent out. You can see it here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-November/036484.html After much discussion, there are some changes to the proposal – some significant and some minor. One major point, this proposal does not address the issue of catching an exception thrown from a non-invoke instruction. However if done